Is it fun to mix weed and codeine?
While you should never consider any combination of recreational drug use safe, smoking some weed and taking some codeine is not the most dangerous mix - assuming you take the codeine via the recommended route. When you take a drug or medication by mouth it will make its way to the liver which will “filter” out a certain percentage of the substance. The dosages of medications are determined based on how much of the specific drug will actually be available after this process. That means that if you snort, smoke, plug, or inject a drug that is intended for oral use you won't know how much you're truly taking, and that puts you at risk of overdosing.To answer your actual question, mixing weed with codeine is fun for some people while others feel that the two counteract each other. People experience a codeine high in two different ways; it either mellows them out or it gives them a rush of energy. If you are the kind of person who gets relaxed and mellowed from codeine you would probably enjoy smoking some weed with it since the two drugs would compliment each other well. If you are the kind of person who gets energized by codeine and enjoy the feeling you might not like mixing it with marijuana since it can feel like it counteracts your codeine buzz. I always felt like smoking weed ruined my high and I always made sure to not even smoke for a few hours before I took an opioid. On the other hand I had friend who was also energized by opioids and she loved smoking weed with the milder ones, I.E., codeine. To her, the combination of the euphoric high and the mellowness of weed was reminiscent of shooting heroin. There's just no way to know if it will be fun for you so just be prepared for it to go either way. The only way to know if the codeine/pot mix is your thing is to try it.Good luck & please do not take more than a starting dose of codeine - and take it by mouth!
Can I get codeine syrup in California OTC?
If you can prove that the concept of perfection is selfcontradictory, you can prove that it does not make sense to say of anyone that they are perfect.Let us take as the definition of perfect: an object A is perfect if there is no conceivable object B which, if it were to exist, would be better than A. Note that this requires a metric of betterness. For our purposes, any consistent metric will do. We shall call it the B function. We require B to be such that if B(X) > B(Y), and B(Y) > B(Z), then B(X) > B(Z).Let us assume that person X is perfect. In other words, it is categorically not possible that there is another person Y, such that B(Y) > B(X). This is trivially true if everybody has the same value of B. Then everybody is perfect, just the way they are. So the first thing you should ask of anybody who calls you imperfect is “What gives you the right to determine a metric of betterness which discriminates against me?” Anybody who claims that right is either perfect, or - much more likely - seriously disturbed.But suppose there is a metric B which you and your accuser agree. (Note that it is no accident that the devil’s chief function is that of accuser). Then it is evident that there is an upper limit to B, say U. Then B(X) = U. This means that X never makes mistakes, ever. Because otherwise we could conceive of some Y just like X, making one less mistake and therefore being better than X. However, you can’t learn without making mistakes. Y might be better today, but less adaptable to the future, by virtue of having learned less. If you take the future into account, X is better. You cannot define a metric of betterness which at the same time is 100% concerned with the current situation and 100% concerned with the future. People who are overly concerned with perfection are blind to the future
Where can I get a free sample of Actavis Promethazine cough syrup?
Anybody who would come to that conclusion, that is, that those who experience disaster are being punished, are betraying an ignorance about what the Bible teaches about the character of God.We humans tend to view longevity or material possessions or good health as blessings and therefore poverty or illness or a shortened life as tragic.But what if what really matters in this life is the lessons we learn through our suffering? This life is mercifully short and packed with experiences that will translate into the next life..or not, depending on what we do with them.the Bible says that God is not willing that any should perish but that all would come to repentance.The most wicked King of the kingdom of Judah was Manasseh. He reigned for 55 years, more than any other king and yet he shed innocent blood during most of his reign. His gryandson, Josiah, only reigned 31 years, though he was one of the top 5 Kings of Judah, in righteousness comparable to King David.What was Josiah's sin that he be so punished? Only God knows the answer to this question, but I do find it interesting that Manasseh had a change of heart at the end of his life and enacted a series of reforms before he died.Had he been properly judged for all of his misdeeds, that moment of repentance would not have happened and he would have died in his sins.Why was John the Baptist beheaded, as well as James, but Peter was spared? I'm sure God had his purposes.The disciples once asked Jesus, who sinned, this blind man or his parents? Jesus told them, neither the blind man or his parents sinned but he was left that way for that very moment so that when Jesus healed him it would bring glory to God.Luke 13 Now there were some present at that time who told Jesus about the Galileans whose blood Pilate had mixed with their sacrifices. 2 Jesus answered, “Do you think that these Galileans were worse sinners than all the other Galileans because they suffered this way? 3 I tell you, no! But unless you repent, you too will all perish. 4 Or those eighteen who died when the tower in Siloam fell on them—do you think they were more guilty than all the others living in Jerusalem? 5 I tell you, no! But unless you repent, you too will all perish.”