Please help describe how Newton's 2nd law is demonstrated in the popsicle bridge activity?
Newton's laws are laws of motion. There is no motion involved here. None of Newton's laws are applicable here, possibly apart from the third one, where tension and compression forces on the sticks are equal and opposite.
How does a yoyo demonstrate one of newtons 3rd laws?
"one of newtons 3rd laws?" How many third laws does Newton have? I think he only has one third law. Newton's third law is that when body A applies a force to body B, then body B applies an equal and opposite force of the same type of force to body A. Two forces are of interest to the Yo-Yo: 1: The tension in the string 2: The gravitational force, the Yo-Yo's weight How does Newton's 3rd law apply? #1: the tension in the string at the Yo-Yo spooling is equal and opposite to the tension in the string where your hand is pulled downward. #2: The Earth pulls downward on the Yo-Yo with gravity, the Yo-Yo pulls upward on the Earth with gravity. We just don't notice Earth's change in motion because Earth is so massive.
How does a balloon powered car demonstrate Newton's Laws of Motion?
Your balloon powered car demonstrates Newton's 3rd law of motion. Newton's third law states that every action has an equal and opposite reaction. When the air from the balloon goes through the straw, it carries a force. The direction of this force is in the direction of the flow of the air, in your case, to the back of the car. This is force is 'action'. According to Newton's 3rd law, there should be an equal and opposite reaction. The reaction force will then work opposite of the air flow, meaning towards front of the car. This force will cause the car to move forward. So you see, Newton's 3rd law can explain your balloon powered car. Hope this was helpful.
How would clackers demonstrate all 3 Newton's laws?
On Clackers: Law 1: law of inertia To make the balls move, you must pull on the middle of the rope to apply force to them. They then keep moving until gravity or the rope pull them back downward. Law 2: Definition of force The rope applies force to the balls along the radius of the path, accelerating the balls in a circle. Law 3: Equal and opposite reactions The balls pull away from the rope at the same time as the rope pulls on them. Centrifugal force.
How do the windmill blades demonstrate Newton's 3rd law?
The blades of a wind turbine are impacted by air molecules striking the surface like bouncy balls. There is a slight inclination of the turbine blades relative to the disc plane of the turbine. This gives wind a deflection opposite the rotation of the turbine blade, and the turbine blade in return (as per Newton's third law) receives a torque in the direction of rotation.
How does the trebuchet demonstrate Newton's 2nd Law of Motion?
Newton's second law of motion pertains to the behavior of objects for which all existing forces are not balanced. The second law states that the acceleration of an object is dependent upon two variables - the net force acting upon the object and the mass of the object. Newton’s second law of motion states that force equals mass times acceleration. For the trebuchet, because the forces operate on curves, the equation is a little different. The equation for the acceleration is: F * r = Ia and the acceleration is actually angular acceleration, to account for the curves. The I in the equation is the moment of inertia or. I=Emr^2. The moment of inertia is conceptually found by cutting the acceleration of the mass into all of its infinite moments or points and find the mass of each point times the distance from the center squared then add each of the infinite accelerations to find the inertia, hence I=Σ*m*r^2.
How does the trebuchet demonstrate Newton's 3rd Law of Motion?
for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction, if you push down on one end, the other end reacts by being lifted up
How can one demonstrate Issac Newton's three laws of motion?
I am assuming that you are asking this question, because you want to demonstrate these laws in a classroom environment. The examples that I am about to give are not really scientific type, but I hope it conveys the message.Ist Law: Well, to engineers the best example is playing counter strike or to kids watching movies. Unless, there will be some external factor stopping them, they will continue to do the same thing.IInd Law: A really buffed up guy from gym, can probably pick up a maruti 800, But, if you tickle him, while he is showing off with Maruti, he may not be able to run as fast to catch you.IIIrd Law: You really have a "shitty" start of the morning, if you have had spicy food in dinner.
Why is sodium light used in Newton's ring experiment?
In newtons ring experiment a plano convex lens is placed over a glass plate and air film is enlosed between them. The light incident in it is partially reflected from the upper and lower surface of glass plate. These two reflected lights are superimposed to form newtons ring. This is possible only when the light has a single wavelength. So sodium light is used as it has a single wavelength.
What did Newton get wrong that Einstein got right, and what did Einstein get wrong that later physicists got right?
Newton never considered time to be a part of physics. It, together with space, formed the stage on which physics performed. When you solved a physics equation, you gave the answer in terms of time and space. Einstein showed that physics affected both time and space. He showed that the stage was part of physics.Einstein made two big blunders that we now think we understand. In his general theory of relativity, he put in a "cosmological constant" that forced the universe to be static, that is, not expanding or contracting. When Hubble discovered the expanding universe, Einstein called his inclusion of that constant to be “the biggest blunder of my life". Had he not put it in, he would have predicted a changing universe.The second mistake that Einstein made was in calling the removal of the cosmological constant the greatest blunder of his life. Had he left it in, he would have predicted the existence of dark energy! (Dark energy is just another name for the cosmological constant; they are mathematically identical in general relativity.) So his two errors were (1) putting it in, and then (2) taking it out.