English Grammar: Is it 'Can you explain me?' or 'Could you explain me?'
Can is used when you want to know about a person's ability to do something.Could is used when you are requesting a person for something.Correct: Can you run 100 metres in below 10 seconds?Incorrect: Could you run 100 metres in below 10 seconds?Correct: Could you please give me some privacy?Incorrect: Can you please give me some privacy?The sentences you have mentioned above are grammatically correct, but probably not in the way you think.'Can you explain me?' indicates that you are asking if the second person has the ability to describe you (i.e. tell others about your personality). 'Could you explain me?' is similar, except for the fact that you are asking them to actually do it.What you really want to say is 'explain to me'. When the object in the sentence (here, me) is to be the receiver of the information (not the information itself), we use the preposition 'to' to show that the information is going to him, and is not about him.Correct: Could you explain to me why the sun rises in the east?Incorrect: Could you explain me why the sun rises in the east?Hope it was useful :)
Pro Gay Marriage Opening Statement?
Is this a good opening statement for my debate in English? Please tell me if I made any spelling or grammatical errors Thanks "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness." I agree with these starting lines from the Declaration of Independence and I stand in strong affirmation that gay marriage should be legalized in the United States. By denying a man from marrying his male partner or vice versa we are impeding the quality of his life, the unnecessary limit to his liberty and depleting his happiness. So not only is it irrational to infringe on someone's basic rights it goes against the culminating point of the documents the United States was founded on. Marriage has been defined as a union between a man and a woman, but if a simple definition is what is keeping us from allowing people love, acceptance, and equal rights then let’s change that definition. After all, homosexuals are still American citizens, and as such should be allowed to participate in our most precious and important social act, marriage.
Are these sentences correct in English grammar? I ate two salads. I ate two fruits.?
The singular is "noodle." Yes, it is a countable noun. If you were to say, "I ate pasta," then you would be using the uncountable noun, "pasta." "I ate two salads." * Yes, the above is correct. Salad is a countable noun. "I ate two fruits." * The above is only correct if you mean to say you ate two kinds of fruit. If you ate two of the same kind of fruit, you would be using the uncountable noun definition of "fruit," thus you would either say, "I ate two pieces of fruit," or, "I ate fruit." As for broccoli, it's an uncountable noun. You cannot say, "I bought two broccolis." If you bought some broccoli, no matter how many, you would say: * "I bought broccoli." If you want to quantify broccoli, you have to parse it out somehow into how you bought it. For example, you would either say: * "I bought two heads of broccoli" * "I bought two servings of broccoli."
Is there such a thing in english grammar as a double positive?
I have heard of such a thing as a double negative Ex.) She don't got no fashion sense. but i was just curious, can a sentence even make sense with a double positive in it. If someone could give me an answer to this puzzling question i would be very pleased to further my understanding of the english language.
What kind of fallacy is it when someone attacks your grammar to evade your point?
This is called an "ad hominem" fallacy (where the debater is attacked, rather than their logic). Be careful with these, though. A friend and I were discussing the idea of existence and God, and we kept frustrating each other because our definitions (of "something", of "nothing", etc.) were not clearly stated before. Nit-picking for a definition or clarity is NOT ad hominem, it is a simple mis-understanding (that often turns into aggression). So make sure that it is not a misunderstanding before pointing to it as a fallacy. That being said, it sounds like she may be attacking you and not your logic. For that, ride her into the ground. Point out how she has nothing left to resort to (which is usually the case), point out how her argument lacks logic, point out how her statement did little to progress understanding, and more CLEARLY (if you want to anger her/embarrass her, make it so clear and simple that you are poking fun at her intelligence) restate what you are saying. MAKE SURE THAT SHE IS DOING AN AD HOMINEM FIRST!!! If she isn't, everything will completely back fire. Also, I do not recommend doing what I said above all that much, as it is a bit of a dirty move (but, if they start it I see no reason why you can't finish it). Hope I helped
What would be a good thesis statement over being against welfare?
First of all, its perfectly ok to show opinion in papers such as this, if it is allowed by the teacher. Your thesis statement should provide your opinion on the topic, three main points and end with an opinion statement. So you would have an intro and at the end have your thesis. Then a paragraph for each of the three topics to support your opinion and a conclusions that restates the thesis. So say (for example) "Welfare is an unfair system blah blah blah, because [main point1], [main point 2], [main point 3], [opinion]." Hope that helps.
What are statement sentences? What are some examples?
A2A What are statement sentences? Any sentence that tells the reader information is a statement sentence. It is a complete sentence with a subject and verb. It starts with a capital letter and ends with a period. For example: It rained this morning. I like you. The answer to 2 x 2 is four. There are seven days in a week. These sentences are statement sentences. They give us information.