Should I make this fantasy football trade?
Yes that is an incredible steal. Allen Robinson is a legit number 1. Davante and Moncrief are low end wr 2's. On top of that all three players are on teams fighting for playoff positioning as opposed to the Chargers who are a swiftly sinking ship. Keenan Allen is the only big target left for the Chargers but when a team is struggling like they are you shouldn't put stock in them especially with so much value at the other end.
Fantasy Football Trade Drama !?
I am the league commissioner. I made a trade a few weeks back that is now becoming controversial. I offered a trade to another manager for Calvin Johnson. I offered up Wes Welker and at that time the starting RB for the vikings Matt Asiata. Well As most of you know Johnson was not playing and maybe coming back after week 10. A few people are upset and think it was unfair. I feel at the time of the trade it was fair. Two starting players for a non active player with a big name. I want to know what I should do to appease everyone. Should I sit Johnson all year or give another player to the other manager like Andre Johnson or Forsett ? The other manager was ok with the trade and I am not going to cancel it and take players from a manager! Your thoughts on what to do ?
How do i cancel a trade on espn fantasy football?
Email your league commissioner. He should be able to fix that.
Can you cancel a trade on yahoo! fantasy football?
I am the commisioner of the league and a guy in my league wants to cancel a trade he already accepted. Can he do that? I cannot veto the trade because it is league vote decision. Any advice. Thanks.
In a non-PPR fantasy football league, should I try to trade Mike Evans for Saquan Barkley?
Yes, absolutely.If someone is stupid enough to trade you saquan Barkley for Mike Evans absolutely pull the trigger on that deal.You’re talking about taking a top 5 running back for a third tier receiver. That’s a no brainer for the Mike Evans owner.If you can get Barkley it be a steal. Mike Evans gets double team, gives good looks for Desean and Godwin. Barkley is a stud and gets lot of screens and yards. Mike Evans just for Barkley is not a fair trade. If we do a redraft, I can see Barkley top 3 pick easy, Evans 1218…Absolutely the best answer.Disclaimer: While I do enjoy playing fantasy I mostly don’t know anything about the actual sport or the teams. I go full on Money Ball just making my picks based on the stats and win from players who use their ‘gut’ fairly solidly. If you haven’t seen it already playing with something like this is pretty solid DFS Lineup Optimizer for DraftKings and FanDuel Daily Fantasy SportsThat’s not to say everyone likes it though. I mostly play with strangers for prize pools but I have a smaller league with friends mostly just for fun and they complain about my strategy because they think it takes the fun out of it.
Is this a good Fantasy football trade: Chris Carson and C Ridley for Sony Michel and Amari Cooper?
I think the team getting Sony Michel and Amari Cooper probably win this trade. But owning Amari Cooper is probably the most frustrating thing of all-time in fantasy.Ridley has probably scored the majority of the TD’s he will score all year already. Chris Carson is a Seattle RB and they are notorious for using multiple guys and are a revolving door at that position. I like getting an RB on the Patriots, as that can be very beneficial. It’s tough to say, and I’d probably target a different WR than Cooper if I were the Carson/Ridley owner.For me, I’m trying to trade Ridley away where I have him, but it seems like no one really values him at his production level so far.
Where do you find the TRADING BLOCK on espn fantasy football page?
Right under my team its along the add/drop players line of links. You should see one that says Trading Block
Should A Fantasy Football Commissioner Veto This Trade?
No, I would not veto (though I think some would). The Hasselbeck side definitely gets more value, but Burress is an upgrade from Crayton and if the team getting Burress has another good QB I see no reason to veto.