TRENDING NEWS

POPULAR NEWS

Am I The Only Conservative Who Thinks Obama Should Carpet Bomb Syria

What would happen if ISIS kills Obama, Biden, and Clinton?

I don't know.What do you think ISIS would like to have happen? I think they would like the USA to bomb hell out of some only marginally involved nation. They might all die laughing if the USA would do what Senator Romeo or whatever his name is would like us to do. How would the world, and especially the world of Islam, react if the USA carpet bombed Nation X in the Middle East with low-fallout people-killer bombs? Just as ISIS would like them to would be my bet.

Why are people calling ISIS "terrorists"?

I'm seriously sick and tired of xenophobic idiots who call ISIS "evil" or "terrorists". And what about the actions of USA? they murdered hundreds of thousands of innocent people by dropping the Atomic Bomb on japanese cities. They also bombarded German cities killing thousands of innocent children. And in recent times, they have invaded Iraq and killed thousand of people, also in Afghanistan..

So why is everybody calling ISIS evil.. when in fact they are freedom fighters who want to bring stability and order in middle east. Please serious answers only.

How much responsibility should Trump take for the sending of bombs to many of his opponents?

None, we didnt blame bernie for the actions of his campaign volunteer shooting republicans as they practiced baseball. We shouldnt blame truml for the actions of a deranged lunatic who wanted to send bombs to political enemies too. However it should be an opportunity to unify against the escalation of retoric that is driving politics crazy. “Get in their faces” “we can’t be civil with them till after the election” they have no place in the United States. Violence in politics is wrong no matter who does it. This should be a unifying moment against escalation in violence. But one side doesn’t want to de-escalate.

Who is more hawkish, Hillary Clinton or Ted Cruz?

Neither. This is one of those questions asking for opinions rather than facts. The fact is, we have no idea what Cruz would do as president because he has no track record. Cruz was an excellent lawyer. The tactics he proposed as a Senator are lawyerly tactics, by which I mean that he devised clever ways to use the rules to help his clients, in this case the anti-Obama conservatives. He decided the way to attack Obama was to shut down the government. This was an extreme approach that lay outside the bounds of ordinary politics.Cruz--like many lawyers--wants to win at any cost. This kind of person is very dangerous in the international arena. The people who want to win at any cost there are the militarists and irredentists, like ISIS, Israel, and Al Qaeda. These people have gained power by manipulating the US. A person like Ted Cruz who strives for victory at any price is precisely the worst person to deal with them, because they want the US to overreact and send in troops so they can get recruits and money from anti-Americans, or in the case of Israel, they want the US to ignore human rights violations and keep on sending money and arms. It would seem that the Cruz administration would follow the Bush path of violent intervention, but Cruz would believe himself smarter than Bush and thus could be successful where Bush failed. This is a recipe for more disasters.Clinton, on the other hand, has a long track record. Did I mention that she was also a lawyer? Where Cruz has to prove how smart he is, Hillary has to prove how tough-minded she is. Therefore she will usually take an aggressive position, as in Syria, where she wanted to send in ground forces. She gave a very tough speech at AIPAC, where she essentially promised the Israeli irredentists that she, as president, would back them no matter what. Such a position promises nothing but more of the status quo: bloodshed, warfare, and repression.So, which of these candidates is more hawkish? Neither. I must ask the question, which of these candidates is likely to avoid a military confrontation in the Middle East? Neither. Cruz because he needs to show how clever he is; Clinton because she needs to show how tough she is; and both believe in military solutions to difficult problems.God help the US and the world.

TRENDING NEWS