What evidence supports the big bang?
The only piece of evidence I have knowledge of is that galaxies are moving apart at alarming rates, and that scientists can sort of "rewind" their movements back to a singular point. Is there any other indisputable evidence that supports the theory of the big bang? BQ: Do Scientists believe that the Big Bang negates the belief of alternate universes?
Do you support to make a change in education system of India?
Yes, Of course!! Willing to spend my time and energy at cost! Just two idlis in the morning, two chappatis in the afternoon and a fruit in the evening will do! Any takers?
CricSec-What are some of the biggest changes you have witnessed at YA since you have started participating?
(1) It looks like they have gone now. (2) When that happens it is so childish and petty. I remember answering a couple of questions in the Australia section once after seeing Binga's answers in my network activity. There is someone there who thumbs down everyone in absolute multitudes. What a tool. (3) Aseed was my first contact in here and he did tell me that when people got attacked by the trolls, they would receive the support of the Answers Community if they weren't abusive themselves. When I had my trouble some of those troll accounts were closed down before I had the chance to report them my self, so it turns out that he was right. SbS said recently that he has also received unexpected help this way. (4) Some of that is down to the multi's. They ask the most ridiculously easy questions as feeders to help their other accounts out. Then there are the point gaming answer copying cheats. Sometimes that's done so that they can gain points quickly and without effort in order to post live links for spam purposes. This is allowed to go on because of apathy. They should be reported for cheating but hardly anybody bothers. There's nothing wrong with reporting a cheat, it's a hell of a lot different from targeting people whose answers you don't agree with. (5) The skirmishes have gone down but they'll always occur from time to time. People from the past will invariably turn up once in a while, that's unavoidable. They cause confusion because they know all the older regs better than we do and use their knowledge to mock some of them in an attempt to cause schisms. (6) It is a bit cleaner, but after a while off I noticed that I had lost a few contacts when I came back. It seems that everybody has become wary after being continually reported. Some how I don't think it's anyone from this section. People from every country have been receiving violation notices. When a section gets a bad rap people with TR clout from other sections like the Yahoo!Answers one get wind of it because that's where people go for advice, that or chatzy and it's them that know the rules better than the rest of us. Perhaps this ought to be bore in mind when thinking that it's always another member doing it as I used to think.
What are three supporting details: farming has changed from a small family enterprise to big business?
i need some help. also another is that i have to find three supporting details: for several reasons, the midwest has become the home to much heavy manufacturing.
Frame on car is rusted, but brakes need to be changed.?
Do not drive the car! I had the same problem with my first car, and then my mechanic stated the obvious - that if I couldnt even jack up the car because of frame rust, what do I think would happen if i hit a big pothole or dip on the freeway at 70mph? That scared me into taking the car off the road that very day. If the frame is that fragile, its not safe to drive. The areas that hold up the wheels may be too damaged to support it if you hit a huge bump. Bad rusting like that isn't that rare on older cars in areas with heavy snow - salt damage. No joke.
Does evolution actually support one species developing into another?
It depends on your definition of species. Even young earth creationists believe in natural selection and "speciation." Take a look at these: http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles... http://www.answersingenesis.org/get-answ... They often claim: “Evolution is just as substantiated as the theory of gravity,” and they like to play on that word “theory.” But, everyone has observed an object falling at 9.8 meters per second squared. On the other hand, no one has observed life come from non-life (chemical evolution), functional complex design come from non-intelligence, or the supposed evolution of life on earth (common descent). They are failing to differentiate between operational science (such as gravity) and historical science (interpreting evidence from the past). And, by the way, gravity as a scientific concept (an attractive force between two masses) was discovered by Sir Isaac Newton who just so happened to be a creationist. As Dr. Jonathan Sarfati says, we need to quit calling Darwinian evolution a theory (that is giving it too much credit)—“goo to you” evolution is an unsubstantiated hypothesis or conjecture, not a theory. From what I've seen, I have to agree with Timothy Wallace: “A major reason why evolutionist arguments can sound so persuasive is because they often combine assertive dogma with intimidating, dismissive ridicule towards anyone who dares to disagree with them. Evolutionists wrongly believe that their views are validated by persuasive presentations invoking scientific terminology and allusions to a presumed monopoly of scientific knowledge and understanding on their part. But they haven’t come close to demonstrating evolutionism to be more than an ever-changing theory with a highly questionable and unscientific basis. The situation isn’t helped by poor science education generally. Even advanced college biology students often understand little more than the dogma of evolutionary theory, and few have the time (or the guts) to question its scientific validity.”