What's that statement means in Night book ?
If you mean Elie Wiesel's book "to die was easy" means that it is easy to die. All you have to do was let go. When you think about it, when you are undernourished, worked to the bone, beat by strong men and have little sleep; it's so easy to just give up and die. Let the SS Officers beat you to death, stop eating, give up faith and hope and just fall and don't get up. To die was easy - to survive was the struggle. When death was at every corner, it was easy to fall over and die. But, to hold on to hope and faith and to survive was difficult - a constant struggle. It's pretty much self-explanatory. Look at the situation Wiesel was put in and put yourself in that situation. It would be easy to give up and give in to death.
Does Brienne defeat the Hound in the books?
Brienne and Sandor never even meet in the books, let alone fight.In the books, Sandor’s leg is injured in a fight with the Tickler, whom Arya kills. His leg gets infected and he becomes too weak to move. Arya then leaves Sandor to die.The books have left Sandor’s fate ambiguous. I believe he’s alive, and most others do as well.Brienne is tasked with finding the Stark girls. She ends up at the Quiet Isle and speaks with the Elder Brother. Brother Ray doesn’t exist in the books.At the Quiet Isle, she sees a very tall man wearing a scarf that obstructs his face. He has a prominent limp and is seen digging graves and petting a dog. Brienne also sees Stranger, Sandor’s horse, in the stables. She asks the Elder brother about Sandor and he tells her Sandor Clegane is at peace and the Hound is dead. The overwhelming theory is that the grave digger is Sandor and that he’s shed his Hound persona. No one can tame Stranger except Sandor, grave digger is incredibly tall and limping, he’s covered his face and he’s petting a dog. It’s Sandor.So Brienne and Sandor have never met, but Brienne technically has seen Sandor at the Quiet Isle.And a side note: book Sandor would have decimated Brienne. The show likes to overhype certain characters abilities (I’m looking at you Bronn and Arya) and for some reason downplays Sandor’s talents. He is widely regarded and feared as one of the greatest warriors in Westeros and one of the only men who could fairly stand a chance against men like his brother Gregor, Jaime Lannister and Barristan Selmy. Brienne would have been deader than dead in 2 minutes or less. And the only reason she was able to best him on the show is because he was wounded, hungry, thirsty and exhausted.
Need help with the book our town?
We learn everything about Joe Crowell, Jr. in one moment of time, through the narrator/stage manager. What happens to Joe and when reading it, how did you feel about that? How did the playwright want you to feel? Death is a discordant beat among the celebration of beginnings of new life, in the beginning of this first act. Why does the playwright include it? Do you think no scenery and pantomimed actions�the paperboy throwing imaginary newspapers, an imaginary horse delivering imaginary milk bottles, the children pretending to eat breakfast, act, or distract, from the play? Why was the play written this way? Why is there no inter-personal conflict in this story? (Hint: Wilder is not interested in directing us to observe in-depth personal stories.) What is he directing us to observe?
HARRY POTTER 7 omg (only people who have read book SPOILERS)?
1. Well obviously people were going to die. In the first book it talks about how many people died and how many families were destroyed and ripped apart during Voldemort's time, so of course this time it would be no different. So it honestly did not come a shock to me at all so many people died because i was expecting many deaths. I didn't expect Dobby to die tho, nor Fred. Fred dies, George's ear is cursed off... poor twins :( 2. He hated harry because he couldn't stand the fact that he was James' son and not his. I also think the fact Harry has Lily's eyes was haunting to snape because everytime he'd see harry he'd be reminded of his long dead love. 3. Yeah I thot so too. 4. I thot harry would die. 5. He wasn't a bad person. I liked that JK Rowling revealed his past and showed that Dumbledore made mistakes too. I liked how she "humanized" him. Before he seemed to perfect, too good to be true. And besides, people's mistakes are usually what help shape them into the people they become if they learn from those mistakes. Would Dumbledore have been the same person he was later in life if he had not made those mistakes earlier? 6. It never says exactly what they did. It could be anywhere from teasing her, to beating her up, to raping her. 7. I personally didn't like the epilogue. I was diasppointed that it didn't say who Teddy lived with, or what harry and ron and hermiones jobs were, they never really explained who Victoire was... and there were lots of other loose ends too. 8. I think it was good that she turned Teddy into a "Harry" type character. 9. No clue i'm still really confused about that whole part of the book.
Twilight quotes GIMME from the book only :)`?
go to: http://www.twilight-quotes.com/ it has a lot of good quotes from every book, and it focuses on either book or character quotes, and has the page number!! [: i don't have my book right now, so i can't give you quotes that probably wouldn't be on the website, sorry! bummer you threw them away, though! =]] :D