Is you network setup to provide adequate protection against hackers? if not, what would you need to do to make?
This link explains how to secure your network http://www.wikihow.com/Secure-Your-Wirel... I also recommend you protect yourself from malware/spyware/viruses. The best way to keep your computer up to date, and free of any malware/spyware/viruses, is to have the best combo of programs: a good antivirus, a good anti malware, and a good disk cleaner. This is the combo i recommend having and runing once a week. Download AVAST from http://download.cnet.com/Avast-Free-Anti... On the lest side, click DOWNLOAD NOW. Install, run it-remove found threats. Download Superantispyware from http://download.cnet.com/SuperAntiSpywar... Download it,install it, run it. Perform Quick Scan. Once scan is complete, click Show results-check all threats found and click Remove Threats. (As a small PS- i choose Superantispyware over MBAM(Malwarebytes), simply because MBAM is not what it used to be, and Superantispyware actually cleans up where MBAM failed) Download Cleaner from http://download.cnet.com/CCleaner/3000-18512_4-10315544.html?tag=mncol;1 Cleaner is a very useful tool that cleans your computer of temp files, history and cookies. Its also used to fix any registry errors. Do not download more then necessary. One of the biggest myths and mistakes made by people in general, is thinking that the more anti virus programs you have installed on your computer the better it is.THAT IS A MISTAKE AND A MYTH. The reason for that is because anti virus programs counteract and overwrite each other, thus errors in removing viruses. One ativirus an one anti malware, is more then enough.
How true is the story that tinfoil around your head will shield you from harmful radiation?
Tin foil doesn’t protect against ionizing radiation at all. What it will do is to block the mind-reading and mind-control transmissions used by the CIA, Mossad, MI-6, and other intelligence agencies - but only if the foil is in the direct line of sight to the origin.If you’re not sure which direction the transmissions are coming from then it’s best to construct the equivalent of a Faraday cage around your head to block the transmissions from every direction. This can, however, make it difficult to see, breathe, or eat - luckily, if you know the wavelength of the rays they are using, you can include holes in the foil as long as the holes are smaller than the wavelength - for example, you should be able to leave a hole large enough to fit a drinking straw into, and small holes to permit limited vision. This, however, can make it somewhat dangerous when crossing busy streets, walking on uneven pavement, and so forth.Once your omnidirection mind-control prevention garment is completed, you can turn your attention to best practices for alien anti-abduction; including garments designed to thwart their attempts at medical examination and various probes.
How can I protect myself from the negative energy the moon gives off?
You need to go to the grocery store and get a big roll of the heaviest aluminum foil you can find, tear off a strip about three feet long, and fashion it into a hat covering the whole top of your head down to your hairline. This will block off the negative energy of several different types, including the mind control rays the CIA regularly beams out into American cities, but especially the energy of the moon, which is far weaker./humor
Are Anti radiation protection clothes worth buying?
As far as I can tell what is usually meant by “radiation protection clothes” are clothes to protect against non-ionizing radiation such as from cell phones and towers. Since there is no need for such protection in spite of the many claims that there is, the cost to benefit ratio is roughly infinite.I have yet to see peer reviewed work on cell phone radiation being a problem that survived attempts at replication.If the question is about ionizing radiation, it depends on what your radiation environment is. The biggest danger from alpha particles is in inhaling a source. Clothing won’t help there unless it is totally sealed with an air supply. Otherwise even the outer layer of your skin is fair protection against alpha particles.Thick clothing would be some help against beta rays. They are of intermediate penetrating power. OTOH, if there is a moderately high flux or high flux of beta particles in your environment, clothing won’t help a lot.For gamma rays completely forget about clothing to prevent damage. Get away from any significant source. These rays penetrate through any conceivable clothing that doesn’t involve something like thick lead or much thicker other materials.Protecting Against Exposure - ANS
How do you make a sturdy tin foil hat?
Firstly, good luck finding tin foil. Aluminium foil is ubiquitous these days, and tin is reserved for industrial/metallurgical uses. Secondly, aluminum is a very good thermal and electrical conductor, so it may not be ideal for the use you have in mind. You also might think it’s not magnetic, but if the field is strong enough it will react to magnets. Furthermore, magnetic fields can generate electron flow in aluminum. This might actually increase the transmissibility of undesired effects. What I’m trying to say here is that it might actually have the opposite effect of what your typical tin-foil hat wearer is hoping for. It is simply not as protective as common knowledge would have you believe. A sturdy Aluminum hat might just be more of an antenna and amplifier for the insidious signals they are beaming at you than an effective shield against them. May I recommend instead, a steel faraday cage with rubber insulators sized to your scalp? If protection from nefarious tracking and mind-control is what you seek, then this is clearly a superior solution.E3Like this, but for just your head.If you still insist on the more stylish option, then I suggest simply buying a cheap version of the hat in your picture and wrapping it in foil. the effect may be reduced, but it will sure look snazzy.
Is it true that Hillary Clinton is controlling social media (even Quora) so that she can win the election?
This is asinine at best. First: why the hell would anyone following Hillary Clinton need to be “controlled” to vote for her? She’s wildly more valid a candidate than her opponent, whose skills at negotiation apparently include the important tactic of choking hard when face-to-face with the president of the country whose people and very self he has been slandering.Second: Hillary Clinton is a Quoran, though I have no absolute verification that the account is explicitly run by her, as she has not made it a point to corroborate this through other channels. Either way, there is no Donald Trump on this site, directly or by campaign proxy writer. I know, I literally checked JUST NOW for it, and turned up only His Orangeness in the form of a topic.Third: How in the hell would she go about controlling social media? That would be insanely expensive, and she’s not an idiot, so she’s not going to vomit money at swaying opinions when Doritos: Election Year 2016 is managing to bomb himself with every word he says and every dollar he spends. Why expend the money, time, or effort, when you’re not nearly as good as your opponent at destroying said opponent?No, it’s not true. Quora is, shockingly enough, an equal-opportunity site wherein you can ask or answer on whatever you like (within obvious limits, though these limits are incredibly minor and VERY far away). Which is why a Donald Trump topic exists in the first place. After all, Secretary Clinton tends to give everyone a little representation onstage, because it’s the only fair way to do things.
Did NASA fake the moon landing? If so, how can you tell using the images?
Yes, NASA did fake the moon landings. The majority of the hoax was shot on the Universal back lot in Hollywood. Tens of thousands of NASA workers were sworn to secrecy.Well, let’s start with that ridiculous assumption: NASA pulled off the greatest hoax in human history.The MLDs (Moon Landing Deniers) are not taking into account one very important human tendency: the tendency to blab.The “moon landings” happened nearly 50 years ago. Yet no one has come foward to collect a million dollars from Oprah or whoever to blab the inside story of Apollo. And show covert photos of Neil and Buzz sharing a laugh with their helmets off on the “lunar surface” set.Is this conceivable? In 50 years! You, an intelligent Quoranian, know that it’s not. Consider Lance Armstrong. One man with a small team. Could he keep his doping secret?Yet the MLDs would have you believe that not one of NASAs thousands blabbed for big bucks in all this time. C’mon! It just isn’t credible, is it?Side note: Buzz Aldrin, second man on the moon, was dogged for months by one of these MLDs. The man followed him, heckled him, made this remarkable man’s public life miserable. Finally, after the MDL called him “a coward and a liar,” an infuriated Aldrin had enough and punched him hard in the jaw.** Very effective! No more hogwash, no more heckling.** We have video of this remarkable event, thanks to Carlos Casador. To view, paste following four words into YouTube’s search box:Buzz Aldrin punches guyBelow: Saturn V moon rocket nozzles on static display at Kennedy Space Center, Florida. Your author is the awestruck guy in the funky hat. (Photo by Glenn Padula)