How long would a woman go to jail for castrating a man?
If you are a vetinarian or nurse,or just have the ability to safely do it and you can convince a man to make such a sacrifice for you,it would be mutual agreement and you wouldn't go to jail.If somehow reported,it would be 'practicing medicine without a license' and you might serve a little jail time.But if you attack someone and castrate them,then that would be assault and a stiffer jail sentence.
How long may a person go to jail for dating someone underage at 30 years old?
depends on the specific location... anywhere from no time to 10 years plus for first offense, if there are other convictions in the persons past that might contribute, the amount of jail time could grow significantly... the legal age of consent in both pennsylvania and delaware is 16. in pennsylvania, this would be a second degree felony - for a felony of the second degree, a fine of not less than $5,000 nor more than $25,000, or imprisonment not exceeding ten years, or both. in delaware, this would be a class c felony - for a class C felony up to 15 years in addition, if the acts involved transport between the two states or across state lines, federal laws have been broken which can add an additional 10-25 years to the sentence if convicted.
How long do you go to jail for rape?
Im uncertain, even though it would remember on what state you're speaking approximately. There would be some wide-unfold nationwide rules, yet while a states rule is greater stringent then you definately would ought to head by using what they arrive to a selection. i think of for graffiti it would remember on how lots of it, what it is, and the place it is placed. in spite of if it is on a federal development, or a church, and there have been undesirable words who ever did it would probable get some penal complex time, community service to bathe the graffiti, and a hefty wonderful. With rape it would be greater extreme probable with detention center and a hefty wonderful. although, you will ought to look on the diploma of the rape. yet regrettably some women persons out their declare to be raped and a few tell the certainty, and a few do no longer, and the so call rapist is got here across no longer to blame. Please do no longer go raping all and sundry in spite of while you're male or woman who would be making plans to rape a male or woman. although, one should additionally be careful who they accuse as a rapist. regrettably some acts are justifiable to a pair.
You know what you've done, don't you?Any day now, somebody is going to open a web page or start a YouTube channel that features pregnant women brawls.Shame on you for even bringing it up. The purveyors of filth at www.WickedWaddlers.com* will be inciting violence all because of your careless question. It was bad enough when it was just two hangry moms-to-be squaring off, but now that they've started staging these melees in obstetric and pediatric doctor's offices… sadness and woe.Anyway, now that I've gotten that out of my system… of course you can go up river for assaulting anyone. Assaulting a pregnant woman could fetch you two counts of assault with a topping of child endangerment.Note: * - sure hope that website isn't a real thing… kinda afraid to look.
How long should this 20 year old woman go to prision for raping a 36 year old male prisoner?
Have her give the baby up for adoption if she feels she can't take care of it. No matter what, he should pay child support. And I'm proud of her for not getting an abortion, even when she was raped. (: And I think he should be in jail for, like, 60 years. As much we would all like him to be in jail for life, I don't think the specific crime is bad enough for that. :/ He will definitely be in jail for several decades if he is proven guilty (which I'm pretty sure he'll be proven guilty). Hope your cousins does ok! ♥
Why is it that a sick MAN is a monster who should go to jail.. but a sick WOMAN is a victim who needs help?
LMFAO. You think crazy is somehow "better" than evil monster? You'd actually rather be labeled nuts and have people refuse to listen to you or take you seriously, making real communication next to impossible, than an evil monster who will at least be paid attention to as a person? I'd really love to know why you think that because it's pretty ridiculous. Why is it that male serial killers (see Jack the Ripper, Hannibal Lecter) are enshrined in history as cunning and brilliant evil masterminds, while female serial killers stumble about not knowing what they're doing, are schizophrenic and not in their right minds because "women don't naturally want to kill people"? Hmm. In both of these examples, who's the crazy one? Gee. It couldn't have anything to do with women and their concerns being brushed off throughout history as "insane," as some of your friendly neighborhood anti-feminists continue to do on this forum, gleefully unaware for lack of self-consciousness and self-reflection. _______________ Um, the word "crazy" does FAR more than "ignore one's accountability," if you would stop to think about it. I would argue that "craziness" implies victimhood only to a small extent; you attempt to say that crazy = victim, which it doesn't. "Crazy" says you get to ignore the person herself. You know best; she knows nothing and makes no sense. Everything she says and does is silly. You don't have to listen because it's crazy-talk. Wouldn't it feel nice for someone to label YOU "crazy"? We could do this, if you like, and you could let us know how good it is and thus how easy women have it.
Strictly speaking, under the law that is called assault and/or battery. It is a crime, and it is generally punishable by imprisonment or fine. Men get arrested for assault all the time, even trumped up claims of assault. Women on the other hand, have a special unspoken immunity to this law. Often their assaults are overlooked, explained away, or otherwise justified, and spared any negative repercussions of their actions. Do they get prosecuted and locked up, sure, now and again, but more often than not, the “poor, defenseless woman” gets a pass and avoids consequence. A great and extreme example of this is Lavinia Woodward. She literally stabbed her boyfriend with a knife in a fit of rage, she was arrested, then upon trial was given a pass so that this “incident” would not affect her “promising career as a doctor.” She was given no time, and only a minor fine. (Yes, just the kind of rational person that I want operating on me while under anesthesia). She then had the audacity to later appeal to have the conviction expunged and was denied…So… Yes, for a number of complex factors if a woman strikes a man she could go to jail. More likely though, she will not, even if convicted of the crime.
Can a girl go to jail for raping a guy?
You are right of course. Your friend's argument is invalid and shows double standards; many women get aroused and wet during their rape -should we take this to mean they like it, ergo consent? If anything, that's the reason why it causes feelings of guilt, which are difficult to get rid of, later on. You should also know that erections are NOT always voluntary and may even happen at random times, at random places for no reason at all. Also, any healthy male is very likely to get an erection seeing a sexy woman naked. That does not mean he will consent though. Shouldn't women respect that too? There is also the possibility of the woman coercing the man to sex, which is rape, as with women. Generally, the exact same laws apply to both men and women. Laws in fact do not specify a gender. So, failing to say "no" does not mean it's not a rape, as with women exactly. As to whether these laws are actually enforced, I would say they do some times (eg see links below). But as you see, it usually involves physical damage to the genitals, bondage etc. Most of society think like your friend, so it's a hell of a lot harder to build a case, and women usually get much lighter sentences. That is all of course, assuming you do not refer to forced anal/oral penetration with an object, which I would imagine is punished as seriously as with women.
What do you think of castration as a punishment for a PROVEN rapist/ pedophile and child (sexual) abuser?!?
Mutilation is a form of "cruel and unusual punishment," and is therefore, unconstitutional and would be struck down by the Supreme Court. There are FEMALE child molesters and sexual abusers as well...granted, few of them, but they do exist. What punishment would you suggest for female pedophiles? Sewing up their vagina? Cutting off their breasts? See - when you put it into your own perspective, just how awful that sounds, right? In fact, criminals do have rights - any attorney or court will tell you that. You can't just do things that are immoral, no matter how much you think it sounds like the right thing to do. If we did that kind of thing to male sex abusers, then before you know it, people would come up with a million other ways to punish people - drag them behind cars like tin cans? Hang them from tree limbs in public? Chop them up (quarter them) like they did in medieval times in public squares? Torture them in dungeons with hot irons? Where does it stop?