How much do the Koch Brothers pay their puppets to post anti-American propaganda here on Yahoo?
Unfortunately, they don't have to pay anything to have people post their stuff here on YA. Instead, the Koch Brothers pay sophisticated PR and marketing firms to create advertising and marketing strategies designed to legitimize their pollution of the country as economically necessary. They pay millions also to the U.S Chamber of Commerce to have the Chamber lobby Congress to support Koch policies. They don't pay shills to post here; they don't need to because their marketing strategies have persuaded people to behave as Koch shills for free.
Why do Liberals hate the Koch brothers?
They hate Koch because they are controlled by Soros. Soros doesn't like Koch because Koch is libertarians nationalists. Soros is a globalists internationalists. He makes his billions by destroyings countries and he is trying to destroy America via his commie Democrat puppets and Koch is trying to make America energy independent. It is very obvious that Soros a foreigner is trying to take out Koch w any means as possible. He owns most of the media so u will see a lot of smear campaigns. He needs Koch out of the way so no one is wealthy enough to stop his anti American agenda.
HOW MUCH DOES PUTIN AND THE KOCH BROTHERS PAY THEIR TROLLS PER COMMENT?
I doubt they pay more than a few. most real purveyors of literally fake news, ie completely fabricated stories written entirely as propaganda with no basis in fact whatsoever, make money by creating their own websites to post this stuff on and collecting ad revenue. mainly in foreign countries but in english of course and usually aimed squarely at right wing conservatives. the more they post what their target audience wants to hear, the more money they make as the monkeys click on the confirmation bias candy. it makes good business sense, regardless of anything else, as the right wing conservative demographic is famous for its gullibility anyway. anyone can confirm that by listening to any right wing radio show you care to name, and noting the many obvious scams being advertised between the host's fits of hysteria the trolls you see in places like this aren't paid anything, or maybe in peanut butter sandwiches, I don't know. I expect a lot of them are fat old alcoholic man children sitting around in their darkened trailers, or moms basement as the case may be.
Is there evidence that George Soros is anti American or is he a victim of fear mongering?
This article in Snopes seems to answer your question. The right has vilified Soros becaseu he has a plan to support progressive causes that will fund those causes in an enormous way. The right has no problems with the Mercers and Koch’s doing exactly the same thing for their causes but single out Soros as doing something wrong when it goes against their ideasBillionaire philanthropist George Soros is reviled in right wing circles — not, of course, because of his vast wealth, which he earned as a good, old-fashioned capitalist, but because of how it spends it, i.e. on progressive social and political causes.He has therefore found himself the target of innumerable derogatory rumors and memes, most portraying Soros as a sort of mad “puppet-master” throwing his money behind “subversive” groups and candidates to achieve his master plan of reducing America to ruin.How do they know that’s his master plan, you ask? Well, because he announced it, supposedly, and on more than one occasion. A quote attributed to Soros making the rounds since mid-2017 unambiguously conveys his supposed hatred of America and Americans:Curiously, despite the claim that the remark was published in an unspecified issue of Newsweek 38 years ago, we’ve found no evidence that this quote existed at all prior to 2017, when it suddenly sprang up, fully formed, on social media. There are no cites, no mentions, no paraphrases, nor even any critical reactions to the obviously fabricated statement in any published source over those entire four decades.
Tell me about global worming propaganda?
More money is to be made promoting the hoax of global warming as true, than to call it untrue. Tons of money are made countering something that does not exist. In fact, Obama's administration lost billions of dollars promoting cures for global warming that do not work, wind mills, solar energy schemes, etc. All the graphs and charts can be cooked by those with a political agenda. For the most part, the left assaults counter opinions with ad Hominem attacks, name calling. The left that pushes this hoax, and it is a hoax, uses slimy politicians like Al Gore, long bony finger liars like Bill Clinton, and misplaced Kenyans like Hussein Obama to further their cause. I've been following the leftist hucksters pushing the man made climate change hoax for about 40 years. First they proclaimed that Global Cooling was an absolute truth. Then, a little more than 30 years ago they changed to Global Warming. They said that the sea level in areas along the west coast where I live would rise, and that within 10 years there would be a marked difference, and that in 20 years the ocean would invade coastal towns and cities that were of lower elevations. Well, it's been 30 years and nothing has changed. That's right, the mean ocean level is the same and the mean ocean temperature is the same as its always been for the last 50 years or more. I live within walking distance, less than a half mile from 8 miles of white sandy beach, and I have lived here since 1976. The ocean is so close to the highway at this point, that during a strong storm the ocean throws driftwood on the road. If their lies were true, the highway and the town should be underwater by now. Part of the town is about 6 feet above sea level, and nothing has changed. I've been interested in Climate Change because of the threat since I live here. Also, I have a minor in Earth Science so I know a little about the earth. It's difficult to measure climate because one must select areas of the earth to take measurements, and they don't come out the same way. It gets warmer in one place and colder in another. So, if the ocean is rising like they said it would 30 years ago, then show me! It doesn't take a climate scientist to see the truth. Most of the so-called Scientists promoting man caused global warming are blackmailed whores to the leftist politicians; and critical observation by even laymen can see that it is a political hoax.
Has the GOP base become a monster beyond the control of GOP party leaders?
I for one am shocked at how low and out of control this has become. Not just Rush's comments about Fluke but the entire GOP base...everyone from the people in congress to their talking heads right down to the voters. From the fear propaganda started during the campaign three years ago (that have not stopped) to the widespread anti-women laws, birth control/abortion clinic regulations and attempts by state and federal politicians of today. The GOP has stood by and watched with relish their constituents getting more and more paranoid and out of touch with reality. I've been saying it since Palin came on the scene...the stuff the right is pulling, their blatant brainwashing and how their base has become a group of lemmings is just downright terrifying. People are actually believing that the POTUS is not an American citizen and that he is out to purposely destroy the country...that he is Hitler reincarnated...that there will be death boards...that he is anti religion...that he is going to make everyone pay for a woman's birth control...I could go on and on...and the people lap it up! It's crazy!
Why does George Soros hate capitalism when he became a billionaire because of it?
on the placement of hating Capitalism: Capital, or money, is a god that persons can not question, and is worshiped by utilising sacrificing persons to it. ultimately, the fake god, Capitalism, would be discarded. Capitalism is deception approximately possession of agencies. There are all new agencies, shops, eating places, and banks each and every 4 years, and an widely used employment era of a million year interior fake economics capitalism, (this is probable a secret homelessness without scientific assurance dying camp). final solvent does not relatively exist interior fake economics capitalism. Get wealthy speedy schemes interior the capitalist company worldwide, (buyouts, IPOs, conglomerates, acquisitions, mergers, and the inventory industry), do not relatively paintings. income latest interior the capitalist company worldwide, or millionaires latest interior capitalism, is pathological deception committed by utilising the 21 agencies spying on the inhabitants with undeniable outfits brokers, (with covert pretend names and pretend backgrounds). certainly economics is the persons that are paying the corporate loans of agencies balloting at paintings with a view to administration the valuables they are buying. the staff of agencies are additionally paying the fees of agencies previous their very own salaries.Capitalism is imaginary mum and dad psychology, fake economics, and criminal deception of workers that are paying the charges (inclusive of the shares and bonds, or shares) of agencies.
Can you specifically identify five lies in Michael Moore's Farenheit 911?
They aren't lies, so much as miscarriages of the Truth. Take for example, the scene in which he parades around the streets of Washington DC, asking senators to sign their children up for the military. Ask yourself two questions here: 1. Would YOU send YOUR kid away to war, under ANY circumstances? 2. Are parents allowed to sign their kids up in the military? Or take the sequence about the recruiting practices of the US Marine Corp. Could you come up with a better way to generate higher recruitment rates? All of his accusations about Haliburton, and the President's motives for going to war with Afghanistan are entirely speculation and sensationalist journalism. He has absolutely no proof, or witnesses to back any of it up. 1. It's a pretty clear cut fact that when Osama Bin Laden took responsibility for the attacks, the Afghanistan government, rather than assiting the US with the task apprehending him, gave him sanctuary instead. 2. Do you REALLY believe that ANYONE in this country, let alone the President, would make a deal to kill thousands of US citizens just so that A company that he had done business with before could make a few extra bucks? The rest of the movie is just sensationalism, narrated by whiny-voiced Moore, who travels the country on a Hollywood budget harassing people, so that other people can laugh at them in a movie theater. I'll give you that President Bush is not a very good president. I'll even go so far as to say that I think he's not a very smart man. But it's that fact right there that has finally conviced me that Michael Moore is wrong! There's no way in hell that "W" could have orchestrated something like this. The guy can't even come up with a solution to fix the Social Security System, and that's just simple math! How's he supposed to orchestrate a huge conspiracy like that?
Is America being destroyed by the Military Industrial Complex?
Yes, and a great example of why I say this is playing out right now with ULA versus SpaceX in the battle to win contracts over military satellites. As is revealed now by actual competition from an entrepreneurial company, SpaceX, the traditional military companies have been charging 4x to 5x more for each launch than it should cost. Not only that but the lack of innovation by the traditional defense contractors over the past 30 years is startling. SpaceX has done more in a few short years than the military contractors have in decades. Now we are told that public companies can't do what SpaceX is doing because they can't bet the company on certain kinds of go for it decisions. This is Bullshit. ULA bet the company and lost. In their incredible arrogance they bet that SpaceX would fail and now ULA are up the creek without a rocket engine to paddle with. So they have new management and that management has chosen not to innovate and compete that way but to cut expenses. They are going to lose. They did not do anything when SpaceX came along and now it is too late for then; ULA is finito.The truth about the U.S. military is that the equipment it gets from its contractors is mostly disappointing. Whether it is naval guns that constantly jam up, or fighters that are a disappointment. The last fighter that was not a disappointment was probably the F-16. Am I wrong about that? Fess up out there military people in a position to know.Here's the thing, military equipment and programs are thought up by truck drivers. I don't mean to disparage truck drivers by this in any way. But their ideas are eating America alive financially.
In order for me to better serve you, what do I need to show to prove my "junk" is truth?
It’s very easy when one wants to believe something, to mentally misinterpret and distort things in such a way that they can be perceived to support that belief, even when it isn’t the case. Kissinger talks about globalisation without promoting or advocating it, quite the contrary in fact. Some people want to believe that Kissinger is part of the New World Order so in their mind they perceive him to be promoting the idea. In reality, Kissinger describes globalisation as a form of extremism and at the other end of the spectrum he places religion, specifically referencing the extremist elements. It is his opinion that the world is changing and will follow a middle path avoiding both extremes. I fail to see how expressing a moderate opinion can be deemed as proof that he’s a member of the Illuminati. Some people wield a lot of power and influence, some abuse this position, some want to impose their ideologies on others, occasionally there are those who want to mould the world to conform to their ideals. This is nature at work – humans do it, animals do it. It proves nothing at all about the existence of any kind plan for globalisation. If anything, globalisation is being driven by investors, share-holders, corporates, financiers etc; people who want access to global markets and commodities, unified trading agreements, the removal of impediments and encumberments etc. In order for you to show me that your “junk” is truth I would require evidence not opinion, fact not fallacy; something that can be demonstrated, quantified and observed. I would require a rational and considered explanation substantiated with verifiable evidence. All of which is currently lacking.