Need some help on understandin the topic of my paper?
I have to write a paper, on this topic, i don' t really understand it, my sources have to all come from books or online journals found in my library, but i'm not really sure what to look for because i don't really understand the topic, if someone can give me a better idea i would greatly appreciate it, and if someone can give any ideas on books or articles i might need to look for greatly appreciate too, plus 10 pts to however can answer my topic the best! Discuss the nature of early relations between the Native Americans and the Euro-Americans. What were the religious factors that contributed to these relations and how did they do so? P.S, Don't write stuff, like this question is in the wrong section, i know it is, and no mean stuff either!
I need help understanding my essay assignment.?
The pronoun is an vague noun and now not definitive or as recounted within the Oxford English Dictionary, it's demonstrative, ie he, she , it , that. It appears like your coach has set you a challenge wherein definitive matters don't get acknowledged, a reputation of a character, or a distinctive geographic situation such because the ball sport within the park. The shiny and urban phrases sound like your coach has made it extra intricate, you'll be able to point out the concrete wall or inanimate item however now not the right noun and in which that situation honestly is. It is an vague recollection that they're asking you to place onto paper with out being to vague. Eg, ' Walking alongside, there it was once, all that I were looking for all day, all week for that subject, and it was once there, and so have been they. They were lacking for over 2 weeks and so they had now not troubled to touch me in any respect. Yet all of a sudden, unintentionally I had occurred upon them within the common situation which was once an underestimation.' There are concrete adverbs right here describing a situation and a sequence of occasion that nonetheless are vague and makes use of best pronouns. It is a sure sequence of parties with out resorting to right naming nouns of both individuals or exact locations.
Need help to understand my essay question :(?
Hey guys! please i need help to write this essay the question is asking me to write about describe a time in school or in my community when i was asked to work with someone who held different views or beliefs from MY own. and How did I handle the situation? i was wondering what did they mean by DIFFERENT VIEW or DIFFERENT VIEW can you please give me an example ? ps. english isn't my mother tongue lang.
I really need help with a paper?
erm, give specific examples? like, we don't refer to people as sir or ma'am, back then they did. we take stuff for granted, like the availability of technology. I'm not sure, but I think for the most part our schools teach us more, and we just hate going, but we should be grateful. .................. So, if you did a five paragraph essay, the first is your intro, and you have that. the second could be on lack of respect, maybe part of the para. on people and how we don't really show them the respect they deserve, when they've been through lots of things. and the other part maybe on lack of respect for buildings, because a lot of them are covered in graffiti. the third, though this is, i think, a generalization, our lack of command for the English language (slang, laziness since we use abbreviations like "dat" for "that", etc..) or for the third paragraph you could have the opposing viewpoint, with examples of situations where teenagers are very conscious of the environment, are politically active, volunteer, and things of that nature. (it always looks good to at least acknowledge an opposing view, if only in a sentence). the fourth could be lack of appreciation for the opportunities and items that are a available to us today, which people probably thought were astounding back then. you could include the school thing here. and for the final paragraph, you could just sum everything up. .................. Also, depending on the directions, you should either clearly state "in my opinion" before your thesis if you're using first person, though it is better to have it in third. try to sound professional, and not use words like "like", "so", "good", "bad", "kid", and in cases where you can substitute another word, "thing" Good luck :)
I need help organizing my English paper?
The question should be how do you manage to condense an event which cost the lives of 13million people ove three years into 250 words. Why pick this topic - we need to know supposedly to stop it happening again. Yet it has happened since - in Kosovo, Rwanda and in the Killing Fields of Cambodia in the 1970's. Just as dreadful - just as hard to comprehend. The thing about the camps was survival at any cost - difficult to keep much integrity when starving. The sommerkomandos were Jews who must have known what was happening. The sorting sheds in Auschwitz (known as Canada) were staffed by people who were sorting through the posessions of the gassed victims - they must have known. What were they feeling? How does the idea of experiments conducted by Mengele and others strike you? You could visit the memorial site at Yad Vashem (www.yadvashem.org) for more information about the topic. One writer who survived was Primo Levi - he wrote several books on the subject, mainly about the guilt of surviving when so many perished. He was thought to have committed suicide when he died 40 years after surviving Auschwitz.
If you really want t understand the topic much better than you do , then you have to identify the purpose for which you want to know about the topic. For example say you are sitting for an examination & you have a topic to cover. There can be 2 ways a person can approach the examination a) Sitting & studying the topic just for the sake of clearing examinationb) Studying the topic not for the purpose of examination but for gaining knowledge. Now there a higher possibilities that you would better understand the topic if you follow the second approach rather than following the first. In the first case , you are training your mind to grasp the topic to serve a purpose which is temporary, whereas in the second case you are more into the topic & your learning to satisfy your eagerness & thirst for knowledge. I hope I have answered your query.
Let's see, "reasons" for feelings?"Logic" for emotions?You are confusing your sorting process for how you feel. You use logic to weigh up the situations and quickly select the one that seems right, with that goal in mind. Doing the right thing according to the rules you were taught. I get to know my real feelings towards an incident/situation only after I have slept over itYou have bought time. Time allows you to sort through your emotional filters also and come up with a combined, integrated conclusion. You weighed up the facts, checked how each probability or option felt, added in who you are and what you are striving for, and come up with a more truthful conclusion. Many people believe they are feeling, when it's really their thoughts or rationale. It is the sequence of reason which is driven to find the right answer. 2+2=...4. That tends to be from the perspective of the right rules of life our original programmers told us. "We" are not in the equation, so there truly isn't any, "I feel" to it. That's how many parents and society get compliance. They don't want you to do what you feel like, they want you to feel what they gave as the right answer. The big slogan is: "Do the right thing" but never question: According to whom? Your ego has to let go when you fall to sleep and you access more of your mind as to who you are. Once that happens and you become aware, you make better choices and change your mind. In the words of the great sage, you become "Mindful". Now you start integrating your systems: mind, body, and spirit; or rational, emotional, spiritual; or head, gut, and heart; or rightness, emotionalness, and truthfulness. Your task now is to recognize how critically important that is to you and not let others rush you into blurting out a quick response. Just tell them; "I need to think about this a few minutes." Most people will honor that, even if they don't like it. And teach yourself to access each local of your energy centers: Head, gut, and heart; or options, feelings, truth. With practice, the time delay will shorten and it will be quicker. I have some patients use their hand to help stabilize and guide it. Dominate hand to the forehead and think of all the options. Then non-dominate hand patting the gut and check how each option feels, then pat the heart with your non-dominate hand and say: "What's the truth?"You're there!
Generally, no. After watching some relativity youtube videos, remembering the stories my teachers told me, and reading many of the answers on Quora, my conclusion is : no. People here and on youtube do not understand relativity at all. Even those who teach the stories of the paradoxes to students largely don’t know what they are talking about.If you work with accelerators, you need relativity to explain how things work.If you work in astronomy, you use relativity to interpret things, but you don’t really have a controlled experiment where you can manipulate variables easily.Based on what I know about how relativity works with particle beams, all of the youtube videos involving trains, tunnels, flashlights and whatnot look WRONG in some significant way.Moving trains do not “look” contracted to a stationary observer. Depending on the method used to “see” them, either their particles look contracted and the train is a normal length OR their particles look normal but the train looks streaked out and long.When a bunch of particles is accelerated, the fields of the particles contract like pancakes in the direction of travel, but the space between the particles doesn’t contract. Since most of an object is made up of space, it won’t look contracted after it has been accelerated.I spent most of my phd/postdoc career measuring the length of relativistic particle bunches in various ways and they are the same length in the lab frame before and after they are accelerated, but after they are accelerated, their particles are short in the lab frame. In the rest frame of the particle bunch relative to our rest frame, the particle bunch is longer compared to when it was moving more slowly. For more details, see: Is length contraction only a result related to observation, or a real contraction?This interpretation is consistent with Feynmann’s How did Feynman explain that magnetic fields are created by moving charges due to length contraction? and Kyle Foot’s answer to Why does a moving charge produce a magnetic field around it? but not necessarily with all of Einstein’s writings involving short measuring sticks and contracted distances between objects.I tried to give answers to other questions on relativity, but because I didn’t answer in terms of nonsensical imaginary trains, people thought I was wrong and downvoted my answers.C’mon Quora - you are believing in fairytales.
I really need help with this please?
3)The convex lens of a copy machine has a focal length of 25.0 cm. A letter to be copied is placed 37.0 cm from the lens. (a) How far from the lens is the copy paper? (b) How much larger will the copy be? 4) A 2.30-mm-tall object is 9.0 cm to the left of a convex lens of 5.5 cm focal length. Find the image position and height. 5)A concave lens has a focal length of -36 cm. Find the image distance and magnification that results when an object is placed 24 cm in front of the lens. (Use the proper sign convention for both quantities.)
You should consult with a good writer or a writing service to do your assignment. Few months ago I used a service to complete my paper and found a good paper from there. Hope you will also get a paper for colleges you can affort from there.Hope it will help you.