So How Do You Make A Bomb This Is Of Course For Educational Purposes And I Would Never Make A Bomb

Read all of http://nuclearweaponarchive.org/...Read up on highest ionization energies of uranium. There is at least one Pakistani paper in the open literature. Get hydrodynamic and neutronic simulation software. There are probably open source versions circulating.  Hardware power sufficient to run it is no longer an issue.Get some deuterium. Concentrating it from plain water would be big for a home project but could be doable with successive electrolysis. If you can filch some heavy water, this is easier. Make a gram or so of tritium. You can do this at home with a http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FusorMake a tiny vacuum tube hydrogen ionizer and particle accelerator for the external neutron initiator. Today you can probably find some semiconductor component to switch it on very rapidly, instead of the traditional http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kry...Obtain a hollow 10 lb. plutonium pit from the thousands in existing nuclear powers' dismantled surplus. They are plated and not hazardous to handle, just don't drop or dent them. A bowling ball case may come in handy. Cast stable chemical explosives into the egg shape for two-point prolate implosion of the pit. Put an electronic igniter at each end and attach to the same controller as the gas injection system. You can make the radiation case and secondary outer layer out of natural uranium, no isotope separation needed. You can make the fusion fuel with natural lithium, not separated lithium-6, but will have to use more of it. You will probably need some fissile material (of any kind) at the center of the secondary, but not as much as you would need for uncompressed criticality, since it should only go off after high compression by the primary nuclear detonation. This is much less picky than the requirements for the primary and its compression. For radiation case filler you shouldn't need something fancy like FOGBANK but should be able to pick an affordable light-element material with the aid of the simulation software.Good luck! This two-stage design is capable of yields up to megatons.

Using the ingredients that Reese used in the film you could not make a bomb, no. According to the film's dialogue, Reese was trying to create homemade nitroglycerin. None of the components that he used (except for the sugar in the corn syrup) would have helped him make an explosive, much less nitro. It's probable that the film's director and producers didn't want to get sued for showing some ding-dong how make explosives. Can you manufacture explosives at home, including nitroglycerin?Certainly.It's a relatively easy chemical compound to create.Will I tell you how or link to a site that will?Hell no. If someone is stupid enough (yes, making explosives at home or outside the proper chemical environment to do so) is monumentally idiotic. If someone wants to maim or kill themselves or others they'll have to put in their own work on that.

It’s all about trends and indicative behaviour. It’s your behaviour on the internet that gets noticed.For example, if you google how to make a bomb, your motivation might be innocent interest in informing yourself about the subject or for a more sinister purpose. Nobody can know on the basis of a single query. Yes, if the mass “hoovering” of data is really that capable of recording everything, somewhere there will be a record. However, as others have noted, there are simply not the resources to evaluate every query and I would contend that it is an infringement of one’s civil liberties to do so.However, if you start to really get interested and your behaviour shows that you are getting technical information and cross referencing it, a number of other probabilities come into play. Continue down that path and your risk becoming noticed.It’s the same with child pornography. It’s abhorrent, yes? It sure is. But do you know what it is? Probably not, initially. So, you google it and find out. Now you can make informed decisions about your position on the matter. I’d be annoyed and concerned if that put you on some watch list. It would mean that the “authorities” are effectively spying on everyone (I’m sure someone will tell me that they are anyway, and they’re probably right).Again however, googling information and even looking at a few images for the purpose of educating yourself is one thing. If your behaviour shows 1000s of downloads of images and videos and attempts to track and engage with more sinister user groups, it’s likely that you will come to the attention of law enforcement agencies, as I hope that you would.So, it’s unlikely that your googling will attract much attention. Start to set a trend and exhibit behaviour that matches known indicators, and the situation is likely to change.

There is every indication that the US tried to keep the process of designing and building nuclear weapons secret, but it failed to do so for two reasons: (it’s worth pointing out that this is not the same as simply ‘not’ doing this as the question implies):Facts about the natural world can’t be kept secret. At some point in history, it was discovered that the atmosphere was a mixture of several gases: nitrogen, oxygen, and traces of others. The scientist who first discovered this could simply have refused to tell anyone…but the tools of discovery for this fact are everywhere. The atmosphere is pervasive, and knowledge about partial pressures of gases and the masses of various elements are either known (through tables and books) or can be derived experimentally. The same is true for nuclear weapons. The technology involved in their design, even if nothing about the topic is known, can be worked out by a reasonably clever individual from available information (physics textbooks) and experimentation. This is, in fact, exactly how US bomb scientists worked it out - from prior knowledge, and experimentation (guided by some theoretical work). This fact is by far the most important reason bomb secrets weren’t kept secret - because science can’t be kept secret.The US Bomb project was infiltrated by spies from the beginning. The Soviet Union was suspicious of its ally, the United States (for good reason, as it turns out - they were secretly developing a nuclear bomb!). From essentially the beginning of the Manhattan Project, agents from the Soviet intelligence organizations had infiltrated the Manhattan Project and been passing the results of experiments to the West. This intelligence was used to ‘course-correct’ the Soviet scientists (who were brilliant in their own right, and would’ve found out the secrets of the bomb independently).I don’t think the subtext of your question has any relevance to the answer. There has probably been some intentional dissemination of bomb information (to the United Kingdom, for one, and also probably to Israel and NATO allies) - but this was done after the ‘secret got out’ to the USSR. As for a financial motive…one can speculate as to motivations, but the fact is from the beginning the US Government worked to keep the bomb program secret, even from allies like the United Kingdom.