The Cia Benghazi Hearings Proved Every Claim Of Fox News About Benghazi To Be Ridiculous Pap. Are

Could Hillary Clinton be indicted based on her newly leaked P2P emails?

BFD.How pathetic to grasp at straws to keep alive a failed 30 year campaign of smears and disinformation.How shameful to turn this country into a banana republic by prosecuting a defeated opponent on pathetic made up “crimes.”How ironic that Hilary-hater Judicial Watch calls for “a serious criminal investigation by an independent Trump Justice Department." A TRUMP Justice Department? How about the “United States Justice Department” to start with?Maybe the TRUMP Justice Department should instead go after Dick Cheney. After all, Cheney really did commit a felony when he blew the cover of a clandestine CIA officer (spy) searching for evidence of nuclear proliferation in a dangerous overseas posting — just because Cheney was mad that her non-CIA husband wouldn't play ball on political issues.That's real news, not “fake” news. Remember, Scooter Libby took the fall for him and got his sentence commuted, removing the incentive for him to finger Cheney? A real hero.[By the way, for those who are puzzled, like I was, by the “leak” reference, this actually concerns a Freedom of Informarion Act release by the State Department. The ‘criminal’ behavior mentioned by Fox is ludicrous — help with some travel visas, a knock on Joe Biden’s performance on a Mexico tour, and worst of all tips for Clinton’s State Department speechwriter from the mother of Clinton’s State Department chief of staff on how to write an official State Department speech by Clinton at a women’s university in Saudi Arabia. Lots of secret stuff like, “"try not to offend them with this …”]

Why is America upset about Russia meddling in their elections when the US has been meddling in other countries' affairs for decades?

For the same reason Russia arrested and convicted Sergei Skripal for spying for the British even though Russia has always had spies in the UK, and the same reason the FBI rolled up a ring of Russian sleeper agents in the United States in 2010, even though the US surely continues to spy on Russia:Because that's how the game works. You can't not play the game, because you know the other guys will, but the game also requires that everyone (a) deny they're doing it and (b) make every effort to thwart the others by pursuing, uncovering, and punishing to the extent possible.International politics are played by overt and covert means. This is hardly a shocker. That doesn't mean, when covert means get outed, that you throw up your hands.Incorrect.When you uncover meddling, you prosecute and convict. Impose sanctions when you can. You also get righteously pissed off, as Iranians and Chileans are about CIA meddling decades ago, and as Iraqis and Afghans are about, well, you know.Come to think of it, some of the fiercest critics of American meddling are Americans. Noam Chomsky, anyone? It's not as if this is unacknowledged.The objective of punishment is, of course, both public relations — you don't want to be seen publicly to be weak on foreign interference, unless you're beholden to the meddling party — and as a deterrent. You need to make covert meddling as risky and difficult as possible. You can't stop it, but you can make it costly.Surely in this case part of the indignation is also a bit of shame that it could be so easy, and, apparently, so without consequence. It is embarrassing that all it took to get millions of people to go to the polls in what looks like a collective temper tantrum and vote in this guy …… was hiring some kids to work gullible Americans into a froth on social media. That is sad, and when people get caught in an embarrassing situation they tend to lash out. It's human nature. Sad.In general, however, it's because that's how the game works.

Rudy Giuliani says Hillary Clinton created ISIS. Why hasn't Clinton been arrested yet?

Right. Rudy Giuliani says this so it must be true. Yeah… he has no personal axe to grind against Hillary Clinton. Shall we discuss that axe?During the 2016, Giuliani came out and claimed that Hillary Clinton was not at ground zero immediately following 9/11.Yeah… she was there.But, it wasn’t just enough to try to claim she was not there to belittle her. He actually went further.He actually tried to claim that there were no terrorist attacks on the US before Obama and Clinton.I guess he forgot. Oh wait… isn’t he a part of the “never forget” group for 9/11?Is this just politics? Perhaps he wanted to get even with Hillary over what happened in 2007.As a senator, Clinton questioned Giuliani’s careless handling of things after 9/11. Giuliani claimed that there was no need for people to wear masks when out in public (as Clinton did in the top video). He claimed that the air quality was fine and that it was safe to breathe.It wasn’t.His failure to enforce the decision that all workers doing clean up wear masks has led to many of them becoming ill.The poisonous legacy of 9/11He didn’t like being accused of being careless, or of gross negligence.Wow… wait. Do those words sound vaguely familiar?Giuliani Keeps Pushing His Faulty Interpretation Of "Gross Negligence"Could there be a bit of trying to make her feel what he felt?Who says only women are “catty”?As for Clinton created ISIS… only people incredibly gullible would buy into that.Given that ISIS began in 2004, I believe you need to look to the Bush administration on that one. Yeah… I know… you’re shocked that Trump and Giuliani would be wrong… or worse… lie.Remember the dire need to invade Iraq because of WMD?Here's how ISIS was really foundedTrump's False Obama-ISIS Link - FactCheck.orgPresident Obama Is Not the 'Founder of ISIS.' Here’s Who Really Started ItTrump's Pants on Fire claim on Obama, Clinton founding ISISI would consider using someone other than Giuliani as a reliable source. He’s been known to be less than totally honest.