TRENDING NEWS

POPULAR NEWS

What Do English People Believe About The New Evidence About Princess Diana

Is there any new evidence to suggest that Princess Diana was the victim of foul play?

Disgruntled money making former employees have suggested it wasn’t but a prolonged and expensive inquiry could find no evidence of any plot.People still don't believe Diana died in an accidental car crash. Here's why

Do you believe in any conspiracy theory about the death of Princess Diana? Why or why not?

Not at all. I think there are a number of ghouls, parasites and opportunists out there trying to capitalize on spinning various conspiracy theories to promote themselves, sell books and self aggrandize. Any evidence they present is open to multiple interpretations or circumstantial. They have never presented any factual evidence to support their theories which are entirely speculative in nature. Princess Diana was used to being protected by some of the most capable people in the business who rigorously scrutinized potential threats and inspected and maintained vehicles. She trusted she was in capable hands and instead she was trundled off hastily into a sedan questionably maintained with a driver who was intoxicated and reckless. She likely realized the grave mistake she had made but by then it was too late.

Was Princess Diana's death really a planned crash?

Yes, it was all carefully orchestrated down to the very second, with military precision to careful create the desired death of Henri Paul, Dodd Al-Fayed and Princess Diana, with no witnesses and of course the key element: no one in this vast conspiracy has broken their silence in 20 years! Henri Paul dutifully made sure the maintenance on the Mercedes was properly neglectful and drank enough so that he would gleefully swerve so perfectly erratic as to ensure he killed himself. The paparazzi were in on it too, so no one among them saw or photographed the Fiat that dealt the Mercedes the bump spinning it out of control. Dianna and Dodi even proved game, ensuring not to put on a seatbelts, ensuring they both would join each other in eternity together. Only their bodyguard was willfully ignorant of it. Or maybe the Queen engineered it so it would all look like that!Yeah…not bloody likely at all. You've watched The X-Files, CSI and other fiction too much. Most of life is a series of unfortunate events, which when coupled together create a chain reaction that leads to a tragic accident. Most chauffeurs don't drink and drive. Theirs did. Most people, even in 1997, wore seat belts. They didn't. Most normal people in Paris don't drive through that tunnel at that rate of speed, especially in a dodgily maintained, only-driven-in-the-city car. The chauffeur did. Most people aren't chased by paparazzi. They were. You mix it all together and that's how bad things happen. The Queen or Charles wouldn't have killed her just to be rid of her…they're smarter than that and not psychotic. They knew she was more popular but her popularity wouldn't last as she lived her life. Their experience with the Duke of Windsor and Princess Margaret showed them that.

Why do some people think Princess Diana was murdered by the British Royal Family?

This is in fact a really juicy one.The plain fact is that nobody was wearing a seatbelt, the car was going too fast, the driver was a bit pissed and there was a huge hunk of concrete into which it smacked, because it was going too fast and the driver was a bit pissed. Because it was going too fast (and the driver was a bit pissed) and it smacked into a huge hunk of concrete, the occupants still had the forward (too fast) motion and because they weren’t wearing seatbelts, they all died except one.But you should never let facts stand in the way of a good story. Diana was rumoured to be going a bit mental; the Sunday Times edition on the day she died (they didn’t have time to pull it out of the early northern editions) ran a big article entitled “Diana on the Couch” wondering the same thing.She definitely had it in for the Royal Family. the week before she died she’d commented that she was going to “rock them” with some news. She’d become a bit of a swinger, by all accounts, and the latest paramour, Al-Fayed, didn’t sit well in certain quarters. She’d definitely become a thorn in the side.So, assumptions in certain quarters were she’d been done by a shady dirty tricks outfit in the pay of HM Government. These quarters also believe in aliens, moon landing hoax, the Titanic didn’t sink, and the grassy knoll. Some of them go as far as flat earth. It wasn’t helped by Al-Fayed senior’s lunatic rantings.Really, if you think about it, if you wanted Diana squibbed out you wouldn’t go down this accident route. You’d pay some poor dumb sap with a gun to just do it, keeping any official involvement well hidden. Then you’d disappear the sap quietly. Why do a big show when there’s so much staging and things to go wrong?Pissed. Fast. Concrete. Crunch. Sorry, but that’s all there is to it, just another road accident but to a famous person this time, so it got noticed and speculated upon.

Did Diana Princess of Wales die a Lesbian?

Apart from having seven well-known, heterosexual extramarital affairs, continually dodging the papparizzi, giving birth to two sons, attending innumerable charity events, hugging AIDS patients, conducting publicity tours demanding the international banning of land mines, being fitted for a vast wardrobe of designer clothes, and globe trotting on Britain's behalf for 16 years, when did Princess Diana find the time?

Diana Princess of Wales' documented physical relationships from age 19 until the time of her death include

---Prince Charles, Prince of Wales: The heir to the British throne sired one son with Princess Diana in 1982 and a spare in 1984.

---Barry Mannakee, confidant and body guard: After another servant found Mannakee "comforting" Princess Diana, he was transferred from Kensington Palace in 1986. Mannakee was killed in a motor cycle accident in 1987; conspiracy theorists claim he was murdered by MI6.

---James Hewett, riding instructor: Under hypnosis, Captain Hewett supposedly confessed his affair with the Princess began in 1982; but earlier, he claimed it began in 1985. The romance had ended by 1992.

---Lotus PR executive, James Gilbey: The infamous Squidgygate tape was recorded New Year's Eve 1989.

---Oliver Hoare, art dealer: Hoare, a married man, met Princess Diana at the Chelsea Harbour gym; the affair reputedly took place about 1992. Afterward, Diana made numerous harrassing phone calls.

---Will Carling, English rugby captain: Beefy Carling also ran into Princess Diana at the gym; affair also took place around 1992.

---Hasnet Khan--heart surgeon; Khan was Di's publicity shy lover from 1995 to 1997.

---Dodi Al Fayad, International playboy; Dodi was in love with the idea of marrying the Princess, but for Diana, it was only a summer fling in August 1997.

I would bet the farm (or make that the castle) that Princess Diana swung only one way.

Did Diana, Princess of Wales and Whitney Houston ever meet?

It would seem likely that they may have crossed paths since both encountered their zenith of worldwide fame during the same period of the 1980's and 1990's. Can anyone provide a photograph of their meeting, if, in fact, they did meet? Was Diana known to be a fan of Ms. Houston's many incredible talents? How absolutely tragic that both of these amazing and beautiful women leave such voids in the world with their deaths at such young ages. May they both truly rest in peace.

Who killed Diana, Princess of Wales?

Just to add some facts, starting with: Diana did not die in a car crash/road accident.Death of Diana, Princess of Wales:At around 12:23 a.m., at the entrance to the tunnel, Paul lost control...The first police patrol officers arrived at 12:30.She was moved to the SAMU ambulance at 1:18 amleft the scene at 1:41 amarrived at the Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital at 2:06 amshe died at 4:00 a.m.So, she died in a hospital, over 3.5 hours later.“In June 2007 the Channel 4 documentary Diana: The Witnesses in the Tunnel claimed that the first person to touch Diana was Dr Maillez,[18] who chanced upon the scene. He reported that Diana had no visible injuries but was in shock and he supplied her with oxygen.”I think I’m correct in saying that she suffered an injury quite common in crashes involving rapid deceleration: “which tore the pulmonary vein and the pericardium” and that this could have been operated on in the ambulance and was not.I also think I’m right in saying that some people have difficulty in understanding how it took so long to get Diana to hospital - over an hour and a half for a 20 minute journey.Later: a son of Diana driving with his new wife and neither wear a seatbelt:

What is a good and positive thesis statement about Princess Diana?

She was devoted to her children. I believe that she loved her sons very much, but sometimes it did seem that she used them for publicity purposes and against the Royal family.

best of luck to you!

Do You Think Princess Diana Was Born or Made a Leader? And Why?

If I understand your question correctly, "..was Diana born into a leadership position or did she become a leader by some other method, such as appointment...?

People are split when thinking about the late Princess Diane, as regards her role in the world. There were of course her Royal duties, when married to Prince Charles, and there were her perceived duties thereafter when she was no longer a member of the Royal household.

First, she was from the Spencer family. A family littered with Earls and Dukes and perhaps the most famous member of all, Sir Winston Leonard Spencer Churchill the Former Prime Minister of England. Individuals born into such prominent families are recipients of what is termed "ascribed" status. In other words, they have certain access rights to roles and positions that others (of lower birth) lack. Using this as a criteria we may conclude that yes Diana had more of an opportunity than others to occupy a certain unique set of roles once she became the Princess of Wales. Such an affinal relationship with Charles provided not only this but gave her a stage from which to profess her positions on matters of concern to her and others. Thus, yes, Diana assumed a leadership role, for those charitable activities of her choosing, after marriage to Prince Charles. In short, her genetic background was helpful in securing such a position by placing her close to the Royal family.

Second, in addition to these ascribed statuses opening the windows to a broader array of roles, Diana was able, through diligence and hard work, to obtain a leadership role as spokesperson for the elimination of landmines world wide. Such status which is basically obtained through work are termed "achieved statuses." Diana had both ascribed and achieved statuses.

On the one hand she was in a position, as a result of her birthright, to marry a peer of the realm. While on the other hand, as a result of the knowledge that she gained through the duties of the Princess of Wales, she was able to achieve the spokesperson position as a result of her achieved status.

In conclusion, she had both types of status, and, she used both to her advantage.

TRENDING NEWS