Is it plagiarism to take an existing text and change some words and a few sentences instead of summarising it?
If you change wording to avoid plagiarism in the proper way, you may likely get the remarkable content, yet additionally investigate the accompanying tips keeping in mind the end goal to get clear with the summarizing and plagiarism.How would you know something's plagiarism?Plagiarism happens when you do no less than one of the following in a paper:1. You refer to explicitly from a source without using quotes and enough perceiving the source. "Sources" join books, magazines, every day papers, journal articles, Web pages, addresses, notes, letters, films, melodic verses. Now and again, even a solitary word, if it's specific, constitutes counterfeiting if not fittingly ascribed with quotes and some sort of reference.2. You outline a source without recognizing it.3. You summarize too about to the main (substituting equivalent words for a portion of the first words), paying little mind to the likelihood that you do recognize the source.4. You use someone else's idea, thought, contention, translation, realities or supporting confirmation without demonstrating your reliance on it (with a discourse or printed reference), paying little respect to the likelihood that you change or elucidate the idea or contention.5. You create a source or citation to give the nearness of having done required research.6. You hand over someone else's work, in whatever shape, as your own.Step by step guidelines to Pharaphrase effectively:Reword when you don't need to quote.A revamp should re-show the first content in a shorter and possibly clearer outline (with respect to your paper).Try not to deform the significance of the first text.Put the understanding in your own words and don't simply copy the first with two or three oversights, substituted words, or "unassuming" changes of words.Include a suitable reference, as showed by the style you're using.
Spelling: Why can't we officially remove silent letters from English words and otherwise make English more consistent?
I don’t think it’s a good idea to do a large overhaul of English spelling. As Frank Dauenhauer mentioned in his answer, current readers/writers of English would need to relearn how to spell, and we have a large body of literature that will be in the “old spelling.”And what we call “silent letters” aren’t really always silent. Look at these examples:hat, hatecan, canebit, bitehe, heyto, towto, toylikinglickinglaterlatterAdding a “silent” letter to these words doesn’t add a sound, but it does change a sound. So I wouldn’t call it “silent.”Some silent letters don’t represent sounds in words, but they help us distinguish between words that sound the same and have different meanings.to, too, toowait, weightfir, furmeet, meatWe also have some odd spellings that make more sense when you look at words that are related in some way.two, twelve, twenty, betweenAnd there are some words with a silent letter in one form, but a different pronunciation in another form.hymn, hymnalautumn, autumnalAnd what would we do about words that are not pronounced the same in every dialect? Some people would want to simplify “caught” and “taught” to “cawt” and “tawt,” but others would prefer to go with “cot” and “tot.”A large overhaul of English spelling would be more trouble than it’s worth. What I do think makes sense is allowing it to happen naturally. Sometimes we see “thru” for “through” and “lite” for “light.” “Donut” has become a pretty common alternative to “doughnut.” Over time, these simplified spellings can become accepted as correct alternatives, and they may eventually surpass the original spellings.I did an Ngram for “doughnut” and “donut.” You can see that “doughnut” has always been more popular than “donut.” These results are for books, which are more likely to stick with traditional spelling than casual writing such as personal correspondence or bakery signs.Some related Quora questions:When did people start to think 'thru' was an acceptable alternative to 'through'?Heather Jedrus's answer to What is the difference between tonight and tonite?Is it "doughnut" or "donut"?Further reading:Should English spelling be simplified?A Plan for the Improvement of English Spelling
How do I stop my keyboard from typing/overlapping letters and make it insert letters again?
I accidentally must have pressed a hotkey on my keyboard. If I start typing in the middle of a sentence, it doesn't insert letters, it replaces that space with the letter I punched. What do I do? Does anyone know the shortcut to change this? It's frustrating me like crazy, cuz it happens a lot! And, I don't know how to change it! It's only in my hotmail thought .. any thoughts appreciated!
Can you list me some Spanish words that have tildes (~) in them?
baño - Bathroom Año- Year Extraño- Miss or Wierd depends how it's used Mañana- Tomorrow ñaño- a loving way of saying "brother" caña- Cane Pañuelo- Cloth apaña- To pick up ñame- Yam ñandu- Ostritch ñeque- Strength dañar- mess up
How long does it take to change SSI Payee's?
It could actually take longer. Processing rep payee applications isn't one of the top priorities. Before the change can take place they must send your mother a letter advising her of the change and they are required by law to give her ten days in which to response - which doesn't include the 5 days they must add to that for mailing time. In other words, once they send a letter of intent to change payee they can't process the application until 15 days have elapsed. If she agrees with the change she could speed up the process by returning the letter stating that she agrees with the change in which case they can make the change immediately. Of course if your mother objects to the change it will take longer. In the meantime the benefits will continue to go as they have been which is far preferable to stopping the benefits altogether because it takes forever to get them re-instated. Once the change has been approved and input it takes the computer anywhere from 10 to 14 workdays to process it.