What is the most deranged way you can execute a criminal?
I watched a video years ago called “Executions”, it was in the 80s when all the shock videos first started coming out. I loved those type of videos. I liked the most recent versions on the internet like Gore Gallery, Rotten.com, and Tortures. The one scene I'll never forget was one I saw in 1987 on the video called Executions, of my senior year of High School. It was of a woman who was stoned to death for adultery. I will never forget the feeling of remorse I felt for that poor woman. She was absolutely stunning as far as looks go, beautiful as could be. You could see the terror she felt on her face. The fucking idiots that were in charge of killing her used rocks a little smaller than baseballs. She was circled by about 50 people who pelted her with stones for 6 hrs until she finally died. The method was way too long and painful for any crime, plus the man was found not guilty. She didn't fuck herself, how can he be found not guilty? I hope everyone that was involved or who participated in her death, dies a slow painful death.
Why, in your opinion, do men commit rape ? ?
Good question. It occurred to me after reading this initially, that this specific question is *rarely* actually asked here. Anyway, for the purpose of responding to this particular question, I'm going to answer with men as the rapist, and women as the victim/survivors in mind. I'm also going to write in very easy to understand language, because many people seem to think it's very complicated (Not the person asking the question :-)) There are different circumstances around rape - whether the rape occurs between strangers (which is rare) or rape that occurs between people who know each other. Each circumstance come down to the same thing however-- the attitude of "You think you can say no to me?!" Of course, the variation of the severity of the sadistic nature is dependant on various things. In rapes involving strangers, there's often a "sadistic rush" felt by the rapist. The motivation for the rapist, is to perpetrate violence that results in the victim/survivor experiencing humiliation, fear and pain. The sense that little old insignificant him can cause such trauma and damage to someone (that not only affects the victim/survivor in the short term, but also long term trauma), gives him a sense of power. A sense of control. A sense that he can control a situation and this somehow translates into "aren't I big and important!" In most rape situations as stated earlier, the rapist and victim/survivor know each other. Again, the circumstances can vary. It can involve a husband and wife, boyfriend and girlfriend, son and mother (elder abuse), father and daughter etc. And again, the same motivation pops up -- "You think you can say no to me?" Many people say things like "men do it b/c they are h*rny" or "he just couldn't stop when she started saying no". Somehow people believe that some men "can't control themselves", and something mysterious takes over their mind and free will, and they are no longer responsible for what they are doing. This is also known as a cop-out, or an excuse, and all it *really* explains, is that he's a rapist. What distinguishes a rapist from a non-rapist? Stopping when it's clear that the other person doesn't want to have sex. It really isn't complicated. So, by and large rapists get a sense of control. A sense that no matter what the other person wants, HE is in control, and will stop when HE wants to.
So what if Charles Manson said some deranged things? Did he do anything worse than having hypocritical opinions?
Yes, he manipulated and ordered people to murder others. The rotten head of that fish; like Trump directing Cohen to commit felonies for him.
Can you give me your opinions of this artwork?
It is clearly the product of a deranged mind.
What is the most base form of entertainment in your opinion?
I truly can’t think of an entertainment more reprehensible than dogfighting.Many dogs are made to fight: doberman pinschers, German shepherds, huskies…but the dog of choice is the American Pit Bull. These dogs are bred to fight: they are built low to the ground, with thick, muscular necks and powerful bites, they dominate the pits. But…Do you have any idea how sweet these dogs are? Now, I personally would not have one, because I can’t afford the risk. But a well-trained bully, given lots of love and attention, wants only two things in life: to have its belly rubbed, and treats. They have no interest in hurting anyone. They aren’t even particularly territorial; my spaniel and schnauzer are much more territorial than bullies I have seen.Pit bulls—and other fighting dogs—are trained to be uber-aggressive. They are beaten, and starved, and kicked, and abused to the point that they know no other way to be.But what’s even worse—and this was news to me until just a couple years ago—there are people who will rescue stray non-fighting dogs (from shelters or from the streets), and take these innocents to the pits as bait dogs, there to raise the blood-lust of the fighters. Of course these babies haven’t a chance, and are quickly torn apart.It just truly sickens me.Thanks for the A2A Jesse McCammon.
What is your opinion of Pewdiepie after the shooting?
Unchanged. I’ve never been a fan of PewDiePie to begin with; his style has never jived with me. Being mentioned by a terrorist doesn’t have anything to do with that, and I think no less of him now than a week ago.I mean, there are nutcases who attempt to invoke Jesus Christ when committing acts of extreme cruelty. Such nonsense can be dismissed as nonsense. You can live your life doing everything perfectly and there would still be people who misunderstand you so completely that they interpret your meaning to be entirely opposite of what it was.As a rule, I’ve never seen any good reason to take the ravings of a lunatic too seriously. These ideas come from people whose views are so separated from reality that they believe extreme violence is actually going to help. As such, their words could be valuable only as insights into the workings of a deranged mind, which does have its use. But as commentary on the world as it actually is? The words are near worthless.
What are your opinions on GCSE History?
Apologizes for taking so long, A level History is a beast.But GCSE History?Considering we were the first to sit almost all of the new (9–1) GCSEs, there was too much content to cover in not even two years. Which is the time I had due to the late release AND arrival of textbooks. To cover four textbooks worth of content, it was no surprise that my class didn't finish the syllabus nor did any of my friends who did history at other schools.I’m assuming that you’re either about to take history, doing history, or considering studying history at GCSE. Thankfully, all of the sample papers and textbooks are available now so with that in mind you’ll be alright on the resources part.Personally, I think studying history is a hugely useful subject since it’s highly relevant to many other academic fields such as law, politics, languages, and even STEM subjects to an extent. With the adequate amount of preparation and time to process the content, along with learning the essay techniques, GCSE history can be a great learning experience.Good Luck!
What is your opinion on taken in hand relationships?
i don't know...honestly it sounds a little weird.. but i think that idea women use sex to get men to do what they want pisses me off. a lot. so to be able to just "take" her whenever? hhmm, me says.this could be intarestin" i dunno, that's the mean part of me, the compassioniate side is always comforting,""are you thirsty?, do you have a headache?" are you comfortable?" yeah.. i see great things with this i theenk. -m
Why should the deranged rantings of black gays constitute "music"?
Well, there is a meme going about in the past couple of days that hordes of rappers are gay (or at least a new book coming out that's been getting reviews the past couple of days). Who knows what the poster meant!