Why do Liberals think they are entitled?
ok...so you expect someone to BORROW....50k for an education..repay the principle AND the interest...on $8 an hour? the republican economy : "I owe my soul to the company store...." that's a very real line from a very bad time in american history...and that's where cons are trying to lead us... didn't work then...it never has provided prosperity..ever... that's why we're fighting it...
Why is the Royalty section filled with republicans?
Well, this is a reasonably appropriate place for them to express their opinions of monarchy. They could do it over in Politics and Government, of course, but they might actually have to offer intelligent, sophisticated arguments over there, and they obviously don't want, or are not competent, to make the effort. They'd rather just troll and whine here.
Republicans and Democrats: how do your views on entitlement differ?
Its all about perception.Education, health care and living wages are just as important to a thriving society as well maintained roads and a police force. No one calls those ‘entitlements’. Liberals actively work and acknowledge the benefit of a public good. You don't always have to personally benefit.Conservatives however care first and foremost about self-interest. They put ‘'the individual’ (themselves) first. They claim to advocate a smaller government and personal choice, yet have no problem blocking abortion or gay marriage. To them entitlement means control. They want less goverent control and more personal control. Yet they don't complain when they go to a publicly funded school.They call this ‘liberty’, despite the fact they deprive others of that same right.It essentially comes down to what you how much control you have. And how much you're willing to give up.
Why are all you yanks so obsessed with royalty?
consistent with possibility because of the fact human beings don't have royalty. additionally, we are entertained via dissimilar senseless, ridiculous issues. So the place extra effective to make the main of it than right here the place persons are suckers? additionally, it easily replaced right into a huge deal international. basically because of the fact it did no longer get as lots coverage does no longer mean human beings do no longer care. united statesa. probably has the main televisions consistent with companion and youngsters too, so we get extra coverage of rather lots each and everything on the information. no longer all human beings hate royalty. The "Royal kinfolk" isn't probably politically important. they're extra a factor of background because of the fact they happen to be concerning to those who used to rule a rustic. American video clips have dissimilar fairy-tale components. So this might attraction to that area of yank lifestyle. human beings additionally like a sturdy love tale. authentic and pretend love memories sell video clips, tabloids and whatnot. If human beings purchase it, the media places extra of it out. i'm hoping this solutions your question!
Why do liberals think they are entitled to everything for free at the expense of others, and to take your money and redistribute it as?
That's easy ... Liberals don't think they are entitled to everything for free let alone solely at the expense of others. They understand that each of us will be contributing so that if crap should hit the fan, we'll know that there is a safety net in place to help us through the bad times, liberals and conservatives alike. We know that if we stand together and help each other through the bad times, we are all stronger for it. ➊ Why do you think that ONLY liberals benefit from government programs? ➋ What makes you think that liberals don't understand that they will be taxed along with everyone else, to pay for the social programs they want made available to ALL of society? ➌ What makes you think that Reaganomics didn't initiate the greatest redistribution of wealth in modern history by taking from the middle class to give to the very wealthy on the bogus promise that it would all (and more) trickle back to the middle class in the form of good paying jobs? ... Reaganomics was a scam perpetrated on the middle class by the top 0.1% It's disturbing that many right leaning middle and lower working class people still expect supply side economics to work to their best interests. And, you think that leftists are the gullible and the sheeple ... What you're seeing in this election cycle is that not only the left, but, also the right is now demanding CHANGE. And, from the high voter turnout in support of non-establishment candidates, it's apparent that the shift, on both sides of the political fence, will be to the left this year.
Why are Americans so obsessed with royalty?
Maybe because Americans don't have royalty. Also, we are entertained by a lot of mindless, ridiculous things. So where better to cash in on it than HERE where people are suckers? Also, it actually was a big deal worldwide. Just because it didn't get as much coverage does not mean people don't care. The USA probably has the most televisions per household too, so we get more coverage of pretty much everything on the news. Not all Americans hate royalty. The "Royal Family" isn't really politically significant. They are more a part of history because they happen to be related to people who used to rule a country. American movies have a lot of fairy-tale elements. So this may appeal to that side of American culture. People also like a good love story. Real and fake love stories sell movies, tabloids and whatnot. If people buy it, the media puts more of it out. I hope this answers your question!
Do Republicans talking about the presumption of innocence who think Kavanaugh is entitled to a Supreme Court seat think black men who get arrested and refugees seeking asylum have the same right to due process? Do those lives matter as much?
In Kavanaugh’s case there is no such thing as “presumption of innocence” those that are lawyers have answered that more fully. The gist is a presumption of innocence only applys in a criminal action.Kavanaugh is applying for a job. The Senate Justice Committee’s responsiblity is to vet his nomination/application. They should be doing what any panel of hiring managers would do is looking at his background and asking clarifying questions.Instead the committee refused to get a complete record of his work history particularly what he did, said, and wrote during the time he advised Krn Starr and when he worked for the Bush administration.Further, the minute allegations surfaced as to his sketchy behavior in the past they should have requested a “second look" by the FBI.Instead they chose to attempt to sweep it all under the rug.It is not a case of guilt or innocence it is a case of fitness to perform the job. His behavior in front of the committee was self serving, entitled, and harassing. It was in fact the behaviour of some one with a guilty conscience.Had he been an applicant for a job with me I would have stopped him, thanked him for his time and told him he was not a fit for the position.I can not think of a single employer who would tolerate the arrogance and entitlement exhibited by Kavanaugh.Everything being said in support of him has been arguments attempting to justify his behaviour.That should never be neccessary for any job interview process. If one has to find those kind of excuses then the candidate is not qualified.
Why do British people worship "royalty"?
You have asked this question so many times before and have been told SO MANY times before, that no one worships them. You are deliberately lying. All you do is change the avatar and then ask the same question over and over and over......again. Please, do go away, it's bad enough having the lying coward, James posting his stupid, infantile meaningless little rants, without having someone repeating this drivel every other week or so. Edit.......@ the lying coward James, your answers receive a lot of thumbs down because what you say is a load of what I spread under the roses. Absolutely NOTHING of what you rant about has one iota of truth in it. you ask a question, then block everyone who disagrees and after you block them, you continue to insult them, knowing that they cannot reply. You are a COWARD and a LIAR. Edit........@ at the lying coward James of the purple avatar. The only reason you are mocked is because you are a coward and a liar and for NO other reason. Many republicans post questions in this category and they are listened to. LIARS are mocked, COWARDS are ridiculed. The poster of this question is a LIAR, persistently posting questions with the same LIE, that people worship Royalty, despite being repeatedly told that it is wrong. YOU are MOCKED, RIDICULED and REVILED for being a LIAR and a COWARD. That is the fact. Edit.........@ the filth in the purple avatar, James. I am NOT you pal.There is not ONE person here that believes you, you are a liar, a coward, you cannot be trusted and the infantile "I've shown this to republicans" crap. You are an absurd, pathetic loser, the same as the Wankerbiker from Manx. Did you tell your republican friends that you block any dissenter and then begin to insult that person, knowing full well that they cannot reply? Did you tell them that you are a COWARD and a LIAR too? No of course you didn't, you vile creep.
Why are there more elderly Republicans than Democrats?
First, is it true that the elderly lean Republican?sourceIt looks like the intervals 18-40 and 54-66 lean Democrat, whereas 45-50 and 67-82 lean Republican. It's also interesting that the youth are twice as likely to be independent than the elderly. Let's pretend you're talking about 67-82 year olds, when the statement is most true.They lean Republican a bit, it's true. And they're WAY more Republican than the youth. Why is that?It could be a throw-back to the politics of their middle age life. If you're age 67 to 82 in summer of 2014 (when this poll was conducted), then you were probably especially influenced by the politics of the era from 1977 to 1992. That's the era of Carter, Reagan, and Bush Sr., an era when conservative Republicanism, controversial as it was, reached the peak of its power and popular respect. It seems likely that the political climate of that Reagan-dominated era stuck with those folks all the way to the present.There may well be plenty of other contributing factors, and maybe this argument will turn out to be wrong. But it looks plausible, and is a narrative based on facts. That's something.