My yahoo mail web page is now being seen in chinese/taiwan. How do i change it back to english?
seems that you or somone else (who has ur password) has changed the language of ur yahooa ccount from ENGLISH and set it to Chines/Taiwan language. all u have to is to clcuik at the website below and login there and then u will b able to change ur language of account set it to ENGLISH-US or uk,, here u go http://login.yahoo.com/config/login?.slogin=&.intl=us&.src=&.bypass=&.partner=&.done=http%3a//edit.yahoo.com/config/set_intl%3f.child=%26.scrumb=0%26.done=http%253a//edit.yahoo.com/config/eval_profile%253f.done=http%253a//my.yahoo.com/%2526.scrumb=0&pkg= hope this helps
At this point, aren't you a little surprised when Yahoo Answers even pretends to work the way it should?
I hear ya Brother.......same here. I got dozens of "Best Answer" notifications....and when I looked.........trolls took down my BEST answer. Many of them were moved to stupid categories, like LGBT, or Rodents..... and it's clear my stalker was having a field day taking down a lot of my stuff, with all his sock puppets. I got a ton of violation notices too.....many for one word answers, that weren't any kind of violation. "Who's the hottest singer?" I wrote "Shakira".....and that was reported and removed. and because they are MONTHS old, I can't even appeal, the 1.000 or so points all these false reports cost me. Not that I care. My stalker is trying desperately to get me suspended and even admits so........so Yahoo has got his number.
How do I prevent Facebook from blocking my Facebook account?
Don't hurry. Go slow ⛛ and steady!Facebook blocks [generally] newer accounts. So, if you are there on Facebook since ages, chances are you'll be given warning ⚠ for the same act which could lead blocking for the newer accounts.So here's how to avoid Facebook from blocking you.Universal Point: Don't use scripts or automated programs unless necessary. And even if you do, be wise and smart. Schedule them. Don't use multiple scripts at the same time. Give each task at least a min to occur and rest time of an hour or two after 4–5 hours of continuous scripting. Because Facebook needs to be convinced it's you [human] not some robot doing them.Sending Friend Requests: Don't hurry up and try send to send huge numbers of friend requests. Send as low as 40 [yes, this is magic number on Facebook] requests. Because if high numbers of requests rejected, you're in problem.Accepting Friend Requests: If you're creating fake girl accounts, you're likely to be bombarded with perverts’ friend requests or sometimes fake girls’ accounts like yours. It can be sometimes as high as 100–200. So, don't accept more than 40 at once.Sharing posts: Don't share nudes or racist posts for they can't be injurious to your account if anyone make their mind to report your post.Posting to groups: Don't post same post/shares unless you've used Text Spinners or your own mind to make every shared/posted post on groups as unique. Be sure, don't cross 40 limit. Post to only 40 groups once a day.Don't impersonate: Don't impersonate anyone. Even if you do, be super-smart and super-wise. Block the person and their possible BFFs and relatives whom you're impersonating. This is to stop anyone from reporting you!CaseClosed ™
Yahoo has just locked me out of my own account, insisting that I change my password (just because they say that I must). Should this be a legal action by web sites? Is this similar to having government officials locking people out of their homes?
Do you own Yahoo.com? No? Then it's not "your" account. It's Yahoo's account, which they are granting you access to. Hyperbole about "extorting" at "gunpoint" and "forcing people from their homes" isn't going to help your case when making comparisons to changing your password on a free internet service. If you don't update your password regularly, it is at greater risk of being compromised. This is basic Internet 101. If your account is compromised, it puts other Yahoo users at risk, and forces them to spend time and energy dealing with your own incompetence in securing your account. This is why Yahoo, and most every other website Terms of Service, requires you to take responsibility for your own account security, and expressly tells you that your access may be suspended for this (and often, for any) reason. Literally every time you use Yahoo, you agree to these terms.What would be a better analogy is why you think you have a legal right not to be forcibly ejected from some random stranger's private house after you refuse to follow their publicly posted house rules. I mean, if we're going with a house analogy.
Why is collecting rainwater illegal in some states?
I was kind of shocked at the number of Internet articles I've found (having just googled it) claiming that rainwater harvesting is "illegal." But on closer inspection, I find they are mostly repeats of each other, all making the same exaggerated claim, without citing any facts. Rainwater harvesting is not illegal. It was heavily restricted in Colorado, Washington and Utah until 2009, but all three states have since relaxed their bans. In six or seven other states, rainwater harvesting is regulated -- you have to obtain a permit, which is in most cases is about making certain that your harvesting equipment doesn't contaminate groundwater -- but not illegal. (You have to obtain permits to construct houses or drive automobiles, but that doesn't make people claim such activities are "illegal.") The guy in Colorado who was jailed for 30 days in 2012 had been denied his permit, but went ahead and built three giant reservoirs anyway -- in other words, his real offence was defying the state regulatory agency. Anyway. The theory behind regulation of rainwater harvesting is simple: water falling from the sky is public property, not private property, and belongs in the water table where it can restore diminished streams and reservoirs. Those who collect it privately are "hoarding" it. Of course the opposite theory is: a person who uses rainwater first is consuming less public water. The Internet, not being subject to any kind of screening or editing, is a great place to plant and spread misinformation for political purposes. Re-read any of those "rainwater collecting is illegal" articles and you'll note the political spin, which is a first hint that the article is exaggerated. Here is a link to one of the more balanced ones: http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/...
What makes a girl have sex appeal?
I'd say looks have about 50% to do with sex appeal and the remaining 50% has to do with confidence and the way you carry yourself. You can be pretty average looking, but take care of yourself and your body, know how to dress to accentuate your best features, and you could have heads turning. Many times you see pretty average looking girls at clubs, bars, whatever getting a lot of attention because of the way they carry themselves. Attitude and confidence is where the sex appeal truly comes from.
Why does YAHOO censor comments posted on news stories?
It is becoming painfully obvious that YAHOO is censoring the comments posted on its news stories. The most egregious example was a recent story about the NAVY SEALS who were acquitted for allegedly beating an Iraqi detainee. Most commentators agreed with the verdict, but there were a few dissenters. Since YAHOO lists the comments on a first-come-first-post basis, the page 1 comments can be easily followed. Page 1 comments on this story were about 8:1 in favor of the verdict vs. questioning it. Then something strange happened. After a few days, all comments on page 1 questioning the decision were removed. Now only comments applauding the verdict and calling the SEALS heroes remain. Regardless of how I feel about this particular case, I find it disheartening to discover that YAHOO is stifling debate. Is this a business decision (if so, it is a bad one as people are not stupid and will defect to sites where both sides of issues can be argued) or is it individual employees doing it out of some false sense of patriotism? This is happening with virtually every YAHOO news story. Go check out page 1 of the comments and see how many people are replying to comments that are no longer posted. Someone suggested that if enough people vote "thumbs down" for a comment, it will be removed. However, this does not seem to be the case, as these comments become "hidden" rather than completely erased. So what gives?