Where do women get the impression that they can't have an orgasm without their...?
Where do women get the impression that they can't have an orgasm without their cl toris? When discussing female circumcision, I've found that one of the most frequent arguments used against it is that the woman will never be able to enjoy sex. In fact, a five-year study involving 300 women and 100 men found that even in Type III FGM, the most brutal form of female circumcision, which includes full removal of the cl toris, 90% of women are able to achieve orgasm. "Stimulation of the cl toris is not solely responsible for the sexual excitement and arousal of a woman during intercourse; this involves a complex series of nerve endings being activated and stimulated in and around her v gina, vulva (labia minora and majora), cervix, uterus and clitoris, with psychological response and mindset also playing a role." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Female_genital_cutting#Type_III:_Infibulation_with_excision NOTE: This question is NOT about defending female circumcision. I'm honestly just interested in learning what gives women this impression that they need a cl toris to orgasm.
Why do men seem to think that women get "pleasure" from riding horses?
This sounds ridiculous to me, but a while back, my boyfriend said he'd read something about how women can experience "pleasurable sensations" while horseback riding. Now he's under the impression that all women have this happen while horseback riding. I would have just written him off as being an ignorant moron, but this isn't the first time I've heard this "idea". So what's the basis behind it? I'm a woman and I've ridden plenty of horses. I've never once felt any kind of pleasure from it; in fact, my backside is usually rather sore (in a bruised-type feeling) because I'm not a frequent rider. None of my female comrades have ever mentioned this happening to them either, though I suppose they might not volunteer that kind of information. Is there any truth to it? Thanks!
Are feminists under the impression that it's better, easier and more fun to be a man?
I used to think so, I won’t lie.18 years old, out of an ugly relationship, fresh into college, and full of knee jerk strongly held beliefs. I was unkind, unfair, and absolutely full of myself. I had read just enough to be a nuisance, but not yet lived enough to really, actually know shit. I was also perpetually drunk in artsy watering holes, which probably added a whole level of snobbery to my general disdain for everyone and everything. Hey man, people made awesome art about hating the man, and I hated the man, and we knew better than everyone else.But then I fell deeply in love with a Ukrainian immigrant and had a son. That changed my viewpoints quite a bit. All of sudden what’s happening to men starts to matter a whole lot more when the two people that make you whole are both of that gender, as I’m sure anyone could understand.And the Ukrainian aspect of hubs is important, because he immigrated here with his mother, because she was in a race to get out of the country while she could, before he was old enough for draft. This piqued my curiosity and I started reading about it.I made the foolish, foolish mistake of reading “Putin’s Russia”, while pregnant with my boy. About things that happened to these conscripts, these young boys, that was internal. Just fucked up abuses of power. Not even war related. I’ll spare you the details, just find the book if you have that sort of stomach. I could not even finish it.I asked my mother-in-law about it. Most sombre, but most important conversation I ever had in my life with that woman. She explained how everyone knows that boys disappear, or come back really fucked up from mandatory service. And that anyone intelligent raised them with that in mind.My boy is older, and we’ve discussed it again. She is helping us raise our boy, and she laughs at how much softer she is with him than she was with my husband. But she also calls it her vote of confidence in Canada. And probably in his parents too, but only suckers say that sort of shit out loud.Being a man can be an advantage, sometimes, same way being a woman can. It really depends what is going on around you. And every single society will have instances of both.
Some suggest that men and women just don't seem different, but are really two separate species. What do you think? Can you give any examples that highlight your opinion?
One of the qualifiers of being the same species is whether a male and female of those species can have viable offspring.For example: if you were to get a dog and a horse to mate with each other, there would be no issue. Ever. There is no such thing as a dog-horse hybrid. Those two animals will never be able to produce offspring together. That means they must be of different species.If you were to get a donkey and a horse to mate, you might get a mule. So these two animals can produce offspring, but mules are sterile, so the offspring is not viable. No mule can have offspring, ever, even if you mate them with another mule, or a donkey, or a horse. A donkey and a horse are much more similar and closely related than a dog and a horse, which means they can make a mule, but because mules are sterile. Therefore a horse and a donkey are not the same species.If you were to mate a pitbull with a Chihuahua, they may have a pup, and… that pup can grow up to have other pups with other breeds of dogs. They can have viable offspring, the offspring they produce can also have offspring, even with other breeds of dogs. Chihuahuas and Pitbulls, although they seem very different, really are the same species.So the question is is whether a male human is the same species as a female humanWell, let's do the viable offspring test.If a male human were to mate with a female human, can they have offspring, and will that offspring be viable (also able to have offspring)?Let's have a look at my own parents, my sister, and my niece and nephew. I would use myself as an example but as I have no children, my viability has not been proven.My father (male) mated with my mother (female) and produced their first offspring, my older sister.My older sister (female) reached adulthood and mated with my brother-in-law (Ben) and they have produced offspring, my nephew and my niece.There you go. It's proven. Male humans and female humans are of the same species.
Why women like HOT guys but don't date them....?
I disagree with your theory.. if I really liked a guy and found him really "hot/handsome/cute" i would not think that I'm not going to go for it because he is likely to break my heart.. whenever you go into any relationship someone is going to get hurt in the end and their are equal chances that it could be either person. Have you forgotten that woman cheat too? You have a very stereotypical view of what a woman wants out of a relationship.. I personally don't like going out with hot guys because if they aren't shallow-headed.. I hate feelings like the person I'm with is "out of my league" in a sense.. maybe thats a very selfish reason but I like to know that the person I'm with appreciates me not thinking .. "well I could do better" ..
What does an Aquarius man want in a woman?
Once the Aquarius (male/female) gives their heart, it becomes extremely difficult for them to take it back. The more emotional investment they make, the more they suffer. They are often under the impression that they’re much stronger than others. Their lover is always the weaker one in their heads. Little do they know that they’re the ones suffering the most emotionally; they just appear stronger because they have difficulty expressing their feelings. It only takes the Aquarius to get hurt once, and they would grow to become extremely scarred and cynical. They will hold back from idealizing or dreaming about love ever again. Time is probably the best healer for their wound. However, they will maintain their cheerfulness and open mind, falling into the vicious cycle of dating, perhaps because they’re very afraid of loneliness. To the Aquarius, love is something extremely sacred that words cannot describe. They don’t like to talk about it nor do they tend to say ‘I love you’ very easily because it would contaminate its true meaning and value. Deep inside, Aquarius are naïve and sincere, so their sweet talking is kept to the minimal. Aquarius have strong individuality and freedom of spirit, and do not like their space to be invaded by outsiders because they need room within to grow and express their individuality. If they feel restricted, they will surely rebel because they have a lot of inner contradictions. They’re patient yet impatient; nonconformist who conforms; rebellious yet peace-loving. They have a love and curiosity for people, but are loyal to only a few. One moment they’re expressive, interesting and active; all of a sudden they can become very moody and uncaring. Don’t let their external image fool you – they may not be as happy or upset as they seem, they’re just trying to keep themselvse balanced and in control. Overall, Aquarius are visionary, humanitarian, and have a lot to offer to this world.