Will You Watch My Movie Review Ahow And Give Me Feedback

Do you read the reviews about a movie before deciding whether to watch it or not?

Of course!First of all, paying for something without knowing anything about it is pretty stupid.Yes, I could have just watched a trailer, but that’s essentially the same thing as a movie review - you are finding something out about the movie before you even watch it. There’s not much difference in the long run - parts of the movie are spoiled for you whether you watch trailers or not.There’s also the fact that even average movie trailers often make the mistake of spoiling the entire movie in the trailer, so if we consider that, the playing field becomes even more level.The only way to avoid spoilers entirely is to simply pick a movie and avoid finding out anything about it, other than the bare minimum required to get you into the seat.However, this is unwise primarily because of my second of all: if you’re afraid of spoilers in a movie review, you are simply picking the wrong reviews and the wrong reviewers.When you begin relying on something, you need it to be reliable. So if you are reliant on a spoiler-free movie review to tell you whether a movie is worth going to see in theaters, you expect the movie review to actually be…y’know, spoiler-free. In light of that, you ought to pick movie critics you trust who won’t ruin shit for you.Personally, whenever I want a summation of whether I should watch something or not without having the whole thing ruined for me, I go watch Jeremy Jahns, . It’s worked out thus far.I really should have more than just one movie critic on the list of people I watch for spoiler-free reviews (so one person’s opinion doesn’t dominate my decisions), but thus far I haven’t found more than one critic I trust, so here we are.

Is it possible to include small clips during a movie review on my YouTube channel? Won't it effect in the monetisation or copyright issues?

Fair use does allow the use of limited portions of copyright material without permission from the copyright holder for commentary, criticism, news reporting, and a number of other things.“Section 107 of title 17, U.S. Code allows for reproduction and distribution of portions of copyrighted content, without obtaining the permission of the copyright holder, for various purposes such as; criticism or comment, parody, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. This is known as 'fair use'.” This is something that you will see at the beginning of a lot of review videos on YouTube.Copyright Law: Chapter 1A lot of people don’t fully understand what that means, they think if they are commenting on anything at all they have carte blanch to use anything they want. It doesn’t work like that… if you are commenting on a specific movie as a review, you can use clips from that movie. If you’re comparing it to another movie, you can show clips from both17 U.S. Code § 107 - Limitations on exclusive rights: Fair useNow the reality is that what the law says, and what actually happens in reality are often unfortunately two different things. YouTube has an automated content ID system that may very well identify your use of copyright material and mark your video as ‘ineligible for monetization’ not realizing it’s a review video, in which case you’ll have to appeal that, and that’s a headache.Also, the copyright holder might file a DMCA claim, which isn’t a valid claim, but it’s still something that you’ll have to fight and that is a headache too. And big fish tend to eat little fish.And, in reality, big channels get more leeway with stuff like this, and are much more likely to be successful in fighting false DMCAs and appealing YouTube’s decisions.I’m not a copyright law expert, but I have been making YouTube videos a while and have some experience with stuff like this.