Wrestling Section Who Would Win A Match Between Brock Lesnar And Chris Benoit

Who is a better wrestler Chris Benoit or Kurt angle?

It’s hard to compare the two. Both were technical wonders, both had the mic skills and both were part of the “Smackdown 6”, which allowed Smackdown to beat Raw in the ratings for months.Chris wrestled everywhere, years before Kurt came onto the wrestling scene. He was perfecting his craft while Kurt was just a rookie in the business. However, Kurt was really a star. He could wrestle great matches with pretty much anyone and left it all in the ring.Comparing the two shouldn’t be done, because they are so similar in style and both absolutely fantastic to watch perform.Note: bringing a real life personal tragedy into a question of who was a better professional wrestler is completely idiotic. Condemning a man’s professional career, especially one that ultimately created the person who would commit the terrible crime, is a slap in the face of the wrestler known as Chris Benoit. The wrestler and the person are different, so look at it that way.

What would the wrestling world think of a match between Ken Shamrock and Brock Lesnar?

If the match was to be held at this very minute then it would be a boring affair and you can give the nod to Brock Lesnar..hands down. But if you consider a match between both these fighters at their prime then it would be the most explosive match in MMA history.Reason: Brock Lesnar, comically put, is a man-eating nightmare from hell and there is no doubt about that because you're talking about a guy who is 6'3 250+ lbs with incredible agility , unbelievable resilience and freakish strike power. Add that to his illustrious wrestling career and you'll have a complete fighter.Ken Shamrock, between 1992 and 2000 was considered to be in his prime. When you start talking fighting or MMA, the first two names that come to mind are Shamrock and Gracie. People have gone on record say that Ken Shamrock is probably the most complete fighter to step into the Octagon. Here is a guy who possesses freakish strength, is relentless , move incredibly fast for the take-down, pound you purple and make you tap out in seconds. You can take a look at his fights in Pancrase , Pride and his fights in the UFC during the mid 90s. When Royce Gracie was considered "unbreakable" in the UFC, Ken Shamrock literally went back to the drawing board after his loss to Gracie during their first match. He was the first guy to decode Gracie Jiu Jutsu and was literally the first guy to bleed Royce Gracie during their epic 36 minute duel at UFC 5. The fight ended in a draw because there were no judges but fans and his team literally carried Shamrock on their shoulders while Gracie looked physically torn. Result:The match would eventually turn out into an all-out war with Ken Shamrock's "shoot-fighting" and Brock Lesnar's highly intense wrestling and ground n pound but at the end Shamrock would eventually come out victorious. This is because Lesnar's biggest asset is his aggression which is actually a bullet point on Shamrock's fight resume and moreover , at his prime, Shamrock's speed and tenacity was unmatched while he was also well known at taking down opponents who were larger in size. Add those to his submission and take-down skills and you can clearly see him as the winner. There's always a reason behind a moniker and there are plenty behind Shamrock being known as "The World's Most Dangerous Man".

Which WWE wrestler between Kurt Angle, Brock Lesnar, and Dolph Ziggler was the better amateur wrestler?

I’m going to say since Kurt Angle’s the only one to have one an Olympic Gold Medal, with a broken neck, I’m going to say Kurt Angle, unfortunatly we’ll never fully no until we actually see these three do amateur wrestling, but as old as the man is I’m putting my money on Kurt, simply because I don’t think Brock Lesnar or Dolph Ziggler won one with a broken neck, it’s hard to win a gold medal in anything when your body parts are 100% let alone the olympics with a broken neck.

Can Matt Riddle retire Brock Lesnar like he claims?

I don't think so. Matt Riddle may have a brief career in MMA but the way people have begun to hype him is just lame. Brock Lesnar is in a league of his own.Another reason why I don't think it can happen is Vince Mcmahon. Vince didn't let Brock drop the title even when people thought it was obvious and even when Brock himself had been desperate to drop it. Vince is not letting this rookie Matt come even close to retiring Brock.Besides, if you recall what Matt had said in his interview, he said that he'll retire Brock in a couple of years. That couple of years is an absolute uncertainty. Brock might just have his last Wrestlemania event this year or even exit before WM, who knows ! Brock has an upcoming match with Daniel Cormier in UFC. He'd probably pay a visit to the UFC one last time and then wind up his career. He's 41 already.The last reason is that I like Brock Lesnar and I don't like this over hyped newcomer fella. Brock Lesnar is the reason I've been watching few of the PPVs. Brock = Business. Nobody can deny that. It doesn't matter after how long he shows up, when he does, there's a different thrill in the air. That thrill was common during the Attitude and Ruthless Aggression Eras but not anymore. Only Brock Lesnar is capable of reinstating that thrill once in a while, nobody else. The roster lacks Undertaker, Shawn Michaels, Batista, The Rock, Stone Cold Steve Austin, Chris Benoit, Chris Jericho, Edge, Goldberg, Kane, Big Show.. Only one who's still there to thrill old timers like myself up is good old Brock Lesnar. What I said now can only be understood by authentic wrestling fans. Fans who witnessed the Attitude or Ruthless Aggression Eras. Those were the days. I don't expect today's PG era fruity pebbles kids to understand all this anyway.Matt retiring someone like Brock Lesnar wouldn't be wise and would honestly suck. I hope WWE realizes this and doesn't do anything stupid like it did when Reigns beat Undertaker at WM !